One vs. 2 vs. ≥3 <i>TET2</i> mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Co-mutation patterns and prognostic correlates.
Abstract
6588 Background: TET2 is the most frequently mutated gene in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and has been associated with favorable outcome, with recent studies suggesting a more pronounced prognostic impact in the presence of ≥2 TET2 mutations ( Csizmar et al. leukemia 2025;39:2030; Kynning et al. Br J Haematol. 2025 Nov 25. doi: 10.1111/bjh.70264 ). We sought to determine if this particular observation extended to patients with ≥3 TET2 mutations ( TET2 MUT ) and also held true in the context of recently reiterated genetic risk factors. Methods: The current study was conducted under institutional review board approved minimum risk protocols allowing retrospective patient data collection and analysis. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022. 140:1200). All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP 18 software. Results: 536 CMML patients who underwent CLIA-approved NGS testing were stratified according to the number of TET2 MUT : 221 (41%) wild-type, 148 (28%) with one, 153 (29%) 2, and 14 (2%) ≥3 TET2 MUT . Co-mutation frequencies with significant differences between one vs. two TET2 MUT included ASXL1 (46% vs. 29%; p<0.01), KRAS (7% vs. 14%; p=0.02) and SETBP1 (5% vs. 0.6%; p=0.02). Phenotypic comparisons revealed preponderance of prognostically favorable traits associated with wild-type TET2 but no significant differences between one vs. two TET2 MUT . In age-adjusted univariate analysis, transplant-censored overall survival (TCOS), calculated from the time of mutation detection, was superior in patients with one (p<0.01; HR 0.7) or 2 (p<0.01; HR 0.4) but not ≥3 (p=0.4) TET2 MUT , vs. those with wild-type TET2 . TCOS was also superior with 2 vs. 1 (p=0.02; HR 0.7) but not with ≥3 vs. 1 (p=0.7) TET2 MUT ; the results were similar when TCOS was calculated from the time of diagnosis. Multivariable analysis confirmed the survival advantage of exactly two TET2 MUT vs. wild-type TET2 (p<0.01; HR 0.5), one TET2 MUT (p<0.01; HR 0.6), or ≥3 TET2 MUT (p<0.01; HR 0.4), after adjusting for age, sex, anemia, circulating blasts ≥2%, and leukocyte count ≥13×10⁹/L. The favorable impact of exactly two TET2 MUT persisted in CMML-MD and CMML-MP and remained independent of TET2 VAF, mutation type, karyotype, and other prognostically relevant mutations. This association was sustained in the BLAST (p<0.01; HR 0.5) and CPSS-mol (p=0.02; HR 0.7) models, but not in BLAST-mol model (p=0.12). Conclusions: Mechanistic explanation for this novel observation includes the possibility that TET2 mutational categories based on mutation count reflect distinct biological states rather than having a simple linear effect. The persistence of this signal despite adjustment for established molecular and genetic risk factors supports its consideration in the development of future CMML prognostic models.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Muhammad Yousuf
Saubia Fathima
1Mayo Clinic, Hematology, Rochester, United States
Ali Alsugair
1Mayo Clinic, Hematology, Rochester, United States
Samuel Wu
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Maymona Abdelmagid
4Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, United States
Priyansh Faldu
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Rochester, United States
Rania Abdelaziz
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Rochester, United States
Clifford Michael Csizmar
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Abhishek A. Mangaonkar
26Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Cinthya J. Zepeda Mendoza
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Kaaren Reichard
4Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, United States
David Viswanatha
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Rong He
Animesh Dev Pardanani
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Naseema Gangat
4Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, United States
Mrinal Patnaik
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Ayalew Tefferi
4Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, United States