Oncological outcomes of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with clinical stage IIB seminoma: A binational retrospective analysis.

J Julian Heidenreich (Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany) A Alireza Ghoreifi (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) D David Pfister (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) P Pia Paffenholz (Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany) A Anne K. Schuckman (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) M Muhannad Alsyouf (Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA) S Siamak Daneshmand (Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center) A Axel Heidenreich (Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

609 Background: Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) is emerging as a first-line treatment option for stage IIA/B seminoma, aiming to avoid long-term toxicities of chemo- and radiotherapy for long-term survivors. However, current evidence mainly involves small-volume disease (<3cm), and data for stage IIB remain limited. This study assessed oncological outcomes and recurrence predictors in patients with stage IIB seminoma undergoing pRPLND. Methods: A retrospective binational analysis was performed at two high-volume centers in Germany and the United States. Forty patients (Cologne n=20; USC n=20) treated between 2016–2025 were included. Inclusion criteria were pure seminoma, negative serum tumor markers, and clinical stage IIB. No patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Statistical analyses identified predictors of recurrence. Results: Median (range) age was 35 years (22–67) with a median follow-up of 27 months (1–110). Preoperative imaging showed a median lymph node size of 2.5 cm (2–4.5). Median blood loss and operative time were 100mL and 154 min, respectively. Nerve-sparing was achieved in 97.5%. The median number of resected nodes was 23 (6–49), with a median of 1 (0–17) positive node and a median size of 3.05 cm (0.9–7.7). Pathology showed pN0 in 5%, pN1 in 2.5%, pN2 in 80%, and pN3 in 12.5%. Extranodal extension was present in 52.5%. Nine patients (22.5%) recurred after a median of 10 months (3–36), including 5 in-field and 4 outfield. The median size of the initial positive node in this subgroup was 4.6 cm (2.1–7.7). On univariable analysis, size of positive lymph node was the only significant predictor of recurrence (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.21–4.7; p=0.002). Conclusions: pRPLND provides a curative option for most stage IIB seminoma patients with favorable oncological outcomes. Larger nodal disease may be less suitable for surgical management due to the increased recurrence risk, potentially warranting adjuvant or alternative therapies. Patients presenting with clinical stage IIC disease should not undergo primary surgery. Histopathological results. Median (range) number of resected lymph nodes 22.5 (6–49) Median (range) Positive lymph nodes 1 (0–17) Median (range) size of positive lymph nodes [cm] 3.05 (0.9–7.7) Nerve sparing (n, %) 39 (97.5) pN0 (n, %) 2 (5) pN1 (n, %) 1 (2.5) pN2 (n, %) 32 (80) pN3 (n, %) 5 (12.5) Extranodal extension (n, %) 21 (52.5) Recurrence (n, %) 9 (22.5) Median (range) time to recurrence [months] 10 (3–36) Infield // Outfield (n, %) 5 (55.5) // 4 (45.5) Median (range) size of initial positive lymph node [cm] 4.6 (2.1-7.7)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 609-609
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

J

Julian Heidenreich

Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

A

Alireza Ghoreifi

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

D

David Pfister

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

P

Pia Paffenholz

Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

A

Anne K. Schuckman

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

M

Muhannad Alsyouf

Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA

S

Siamak Daneshmand

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

A

Axel Heidenreich

Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany