On the subtleties of cluster construction when defining crystalline nuclei in atomistic simulations

K Katarina E. Blow (School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick 1 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,) D David Quigley (Department of Physics, University of Warwick 2 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,) G Gabriele C. Sosso (Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick 3 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,)

Abstract

Molecular dynamics is routinely used to investigate crystal nucleation rates via computer simulations. According to classical nucleation theory, the size of the largest cluster should be the best approximation of the reaction coordinate. In Lennard-Jones melts, the sixth-order ten Wolde criterion [ten Wolde et al., Faraday Disc. 104, 93–110 (1996)] is often used to determine particles within solid environments, which are then grouped together based on proximity to define solid clusters. However, the resulting descriptor can sometimes poorly represent the nucleation process. Here, we investigate the effect of cluster construction methods on observed committor behavior. In the first part of the paper, we construct clusters based on (i) proximity only or (ii) proximity and the presence of an oriented “bond” between particles. In the second part of the paper, we vary the internal cutoffs used to compute the relevant order parameters. We find that, although a cluster construction method can have a large effect on the scale of a single nucleus, aggregate properties over ensembles of nuclei remain similar. In contrast, varying internal cutoffs can have a significant effect on both physical and committor properties. The results from both investigations support using a reaction coordinate of crystallinity times the size of the largest cluster rather than the size of the largest cluster alone.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 164, Issue 21
Published June 07, 2026
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (3)

K

Katarina E. Blow

School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick 1 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,

D

David Quigley

Department of Physics, University of Warwick 2 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,

G

Gabriele C. Sosso

Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick 3 , Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL,