Olutasidenib monotherapy in patients with mIDH1 Acute Myeloid Leukemia who received prior intensive chemotherapy

J Jay Yang (5Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, United States) J Joseph Jurcic (1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, New York, United States) C Christian Récher P Pierre Fenaux A Andrew Wei (3Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia) A Antonio Curti (2IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy) J Justin Watts (2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Medicine, Miami, United States) E Eunice Wang (13Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States) B Brian Jonas (2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Division of Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, Sacramento, United States) J Jorge Cortés A Aaron Sheppard (13Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, United States) S Sophia Wang (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Los Angeles) S Stéphane de Botton

Abstract

Abstract Background: Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (mIDH1) occur in a subset (7%-14%) of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).Olutasidenib, a potent and selective oral small-molecule inhibitor of mIDH1, is FDA approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML based on demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the pivotal cohort of a phase 2 trial (NCT02719574).The overall response rate (ORR) was 48% and the rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was 35%, with a median duration of CR/CRh of 25.3 months. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of olutasidenib monotherapy in a subset of patients (n=105) from the phase 2 pivotal cohort who had received prior intensive chemotherapy (IC; e.g., high-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin, mitoxantrone with etoposide and cytarabine, or transplant conditioning regimens). Methods: The pivotal cohort of the global, multicenter, registrational, open-label phase 2 trial assessed olutasidenib 150 mg BID in adults with R/R AML harboring mIDH1. The primary endpoint was the CR/CRh rate and secondary endpoints included ORR (defined as the rate of CR, CRh, CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi], partial remission, or morphologic leukemia-free state); duration of CR and CRh; duration of response (DOR); overall survival (OS); and safety. Results: Overall, 105 out of 147 treated patients had received prior IC. Median age was 68.0 years, 57% (60/105) were female, the most common IDH1 mutation type was R132C (57%; 60/105), and the majority of patients had 1-3 co-mutations (66%; 69/105). The baseline ECOG score was 0 in 35% (37/105) and 1 in 46% (48/105) of patients, and 38% (40/105) had received 2 prior anti-cancer regimens. The ORR was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.6, 59.5), with 35/105 (33%; 95% CI: 24.4, 43.2) achieving CR and 38/105 (36%; 95% CI: 27.0, 46.1) achieving CR/CRh. Median DOR was 15.5 months (95% CI: 7.4, not reached [NR]), with median duration of CR not reached (95% CI: 13.8, NR) and CR/CRh of 17.6 months (95% CI: 12.0, NR). After a median follow up of 37.3 months (95% CI: 36.0, 42.6), the median OS in the patients who had received prior IC was 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.9, 16.7). In comparison, 38 patients received prior non-intensive therapy with an ORR of 42% (95% CI: 26.3, 59.2); 9/38 (24%; 95% CI: 11.4, 40.2) achieved CR and 10/38 (26%: 95% CI: 13.4, 43.1) achieved CR/CRh. The median DOR in this group was 16.2 months (95% CI: 1.9, NR), with a median duration of response of CR and CR/CRh for 28.1 months (95% CI: 7.4, NR) and 29.0 months (95% CI: 7.4, NR), respectively. All prior IC patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) irrespective of the relationship to olutasidenib. The most commonly occurring TEAEs (in ≥20% of patients) were nausea (40%; 42/105), increased white blood cell count (27%; 28/105), constipation (26%; 27/105), febrile neutropenia (25%; 26/105), fatigue (24%; 25/105), hypokalemia (24%; 25/105), decreased red blood cell count (21%; 22/105), and pyrexia (20%; 21/105). Conclusions: Among this cohort of patients with R/R mIDH1 AML who had received prior IC, treatment with olutasidenib monotherapy produced clinically meaningful response rates that closely align with those observed in the overall population, with durable responses and acceptable tolerability. These findings support the utility of olutasidenib in patients previously treated with intensive chemotherapy.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5213-5213
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

J

Jay Yang

5Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, United States

J

Joseph Jurcic

1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, New York, United States

C

Christian Récher

P

Pierre Fenaux

A

Andrew Wei

3Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia

A

Antonio Curti

2IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy

J

Justin Watts

2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Medicine, Miami, United States

E

Eunice Wang

13Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States

B

Brian Jonas

2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Division of Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, Sacramento, United States

J

Jorge Cortés

A

Aaron Sheppard

13Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, United States

S

Sophia Wang

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Los Angeles

S

Stéphane de Botton