OBX-115 engineered tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy with regulatable membrane-bound IL15 (mbIL15) in patients with advanced melanoma that has progressed on/after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): Phase 2 results.
Abstract
9507 Background: OBX-115 TIL are engineered to express mbIL15 under regulatory control of the small-molecule drug acetazolamide (ACZ); this engineering abrogates the need for toxic high-dose IL2 cytokine support after TIL infusion. Early data demonstrated differentiated safety and promising efficacy at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; Chesney ASCO 2025). We report additional data evaluating OBX-115 in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma treated at the RP2D in the Agni-01 study. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 study (NCT06060613) assesses safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the OBX-115 TIL cell therapy regimen in pts with advanced non-uveal melanoma and NSCLC (Shoushtari AACR 2025); eligibility was not restricted by LDH, HLA, or melanoma subtype. Phase 1 established an RP2D of OBX-115 1–100×10 9 cells, with ACZ 500 mg/d orally on Days 0–6 (Wk 1) and 14–20 (Wk 3). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy of the regimen at RP2D by RECIST v1.1 per investigator in pts with ≤2 prior lines of therapy. OBX-115 is manufactured from pt tumor tissue (core needle biopsy [CNB] or surgical excision) and infused after low-dose (Cy 750 mg/m 2 /d × 3; Flu 30 mg/m 2 /d × 4) lymphodepletion (LD). ACZ is redosed (7 d) after recovery from LD every 6 wks until Wk 24. Primary data cutoff is 19Dec2025; RECIST efficacy was updated on 22Jan2026. Results: OBX-115 was successfully manufactured (median dose 83.4×10 9 cells) and infused at RP2D schema for 15 pts with advanced melanoma progressing on/after ICI (doublet ICI in 93%); 6/8 pts (75%) with BRAF-mut disease had prior BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor exposure. 2 pts (13%) had tumor tissue procurement by CNB; 4 pts (27%) received outpatient LD. Confirmed ORR was 67% (1 CR, 9 PR, 4 SD; DCR 93%). At median study follow-up of 18.6 wks (range 10.1–73.4), median duration of response was not reached (range 4.6+ to 55.1+ wks). There was no dose-limiting toxicity, ICU transfer, or treatment-related mortality. Immune-related adverse events (AEs) included CRS (G3 n=1; G<3 n=4) and hypoxia (G3 n=1; G<3 n=2), which responded to short-course steroids; no ICANS was observed. 3 pts reported 4 OBX-115–related serious AEs. 13 pts were alive as of the datacut. Conclusions: OBX-115 TIL cell therapy at RP2D demonstrated encouraging efficacy in 2/3L advanced non-uveal melanoma, an area of unmet medical need. Unique aspects of the OBX-115 regimen, such as low-dose LD, ACZ-inducible mbIL15 expression, and CNB-enabled manufacturing, were associated with manageable side effects and compare favorably with other adoptive TIL approaches. Data support continued investigation of OBX‐115 in the ongoing phase 2 portion of Agni-01 and planned registrational study. Clinical trial information: NCT06060613 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Allison Betof
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Jason Alan Chesney
UofL Health – Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
Gino Kim In
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Alexander Shoushtari
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Tirrell T. Johnson
Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Orlando, FL
Justin Tyler Moyers
The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
Yazan Samhouri
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
Georgina V. Long
Giridharan Ramsingh
Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Raina Duan
Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Prakash Prabhakar
Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Lauren McLaughlin
Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Mercay Reuter
Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Rodabe Navroze Amaria
Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX