Nutritional status, cachexia, and sarcopenia as predictors of mortality in colorectal cancer: A nationwide analysis of the NIS 2016–2022.

A Adnan Humam Hajjar (4East Carolina University, Department of Medicine, Greenville, United States) K Khaled M. Elhusseiny (Department of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC) M Mohamed Fouad Elganainy (East Carolina University, Greenville, NC) Z Zeinab Khalil (2East Carolina University, Department of Pathology, Greenville, United States)

Abstract

51 Background: Malnutrition, cachexia, and sarcopenia are common in colorectal cancer (CRC) and represent overlapping syndromes of impaired nutrition and muscle loss. These conditions are associated with poorer tolerance of treatment, increased complications, and higher mortality. However, real-world, nationally representative data on their independent effects on inpatient outcomes, including mortality, mechanical ventilation, and septic shock, remain limited. Methods: Retrospective cohort of the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2022), survey-weighted to be nationally representative. Adult CRC admissions were identified by primary ICD-10 codes C18–C20. Exposures: malnutrition (E43, E44, E46), cachexia (R64), sarcopenia (M6284). Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes: mechanical ventilation (5A1935Z, 5A1945Z, 5A1955Z) and septic shock (R6521). Multivariable survey-logistic models adjusted for AKI (N17), PE (I26), febrile neutropenia (D709+R5081), diabetes (E11), CKD (N18), heart failure (I50) and demographics. We estimated total-effect models (excluding mediators) and direct-effect models (additionally adjusting for ventilation and septic shock). Results: Among ~171,700 weighted CRC admissions, malnutrition was present in 13.1%, cachexia 2.0%, and sarcopenia 0.016%. Mortality was 2.45% overall and increased by nutrition burden (0→1.7%, 1→6.4%, 2→13.0%). In adjusted total-effect models, malnutrition (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.98–2.38) and cachexia (aOR 3.96, 3.36–4.66) were associated with higher mortality; sarcopenia was rare and imprecise (aOR 2.87, 0.56–14.86). In direct-effect models, malnutrition remained significant (aOR 1.80, 1.62–1.99) and cachexia remained strong (aOR 4.88, 4.12–5.77). Malnutrition also predicted ventilation (aOR 2.08) and septic shock (aOR 2.61). The mortality effect of nutrition burden was attenuated but harmful in metastatic disease (interaction 0.72, p<0.001). Findings were robust in non-elective and weekend-only sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Malnutrition and cachexia independently predict increased in-hospital mortality in CRC with a clear dose–response. Part of malnutrition’s risk appears mediated by organ failure and sepsis. Sarcopenia was rarely coded, limiting inference. Systematic nutritional assessment and targeted supportive care may improve outcomes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 51-51
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (4)

A

Adnan Humam Hajjar

4East Carolina University, Department of Medicine, Greenville, United States

K

Khaled M. Elhusseiny

Department of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC

M

Mohamed Fouad Elganainy

East Carolina University, Greenville, NC

Z

Zeinab Khalil

2East Carolina University, Department of Pathology, Greenville, United States