NRG-HN006: Randomized phase II/III trial of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection for early-stage oral cavity cancer.
Abstract
TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Stephen Yenzen Lai
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kristopher Attwood
NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
Steven S. Chang
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
Saad A. Khan
Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
Neal Dunlap
The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
Beth Michelle Beadle
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Rathan M. Subramaniam
Dunedin Hospital and University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
Jian Qin Yu
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Val J. Lowe
Minh Tam Truong
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
Nataliya Kovalchuk
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Yi Rong
Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath
Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath, PhD, Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ahmed Kaseb, MD and Milind Javle, MD, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Marnix GEH Lam, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Armeen Mahvash, MD, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Diana Bell
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Cheng Z. Liu
NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
Mohamed E. Abazeed
Northwestern University, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
Quynh-Thu Xuan Le
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Sue S. Yom
Department of Radiation Oncology University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA