NRG-HN006: Randomized phase II/III trial of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection for early-stage oral cavity cancer.

S Stephen Yenzen Lai (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) K Kristopher Attwood (NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA) S Steven S. Chang (Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI) S Saad A. Khan (Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA) N Neal Dunlap (The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville, Louisville, KY) B Beth Michelle Beadle (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) R Rathan M. Subramaniam (Dunedin Hospital and University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand) J Jian Qin Yu (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) V Val J. Lowe M Minh Tam Truong (Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA) N Nataliya Kovalchuk (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) Y Yi Rong S Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath (Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath, PhD, Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ahmed Kaseb, MD and Milind Javle, MD, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Marnix GEH Lam, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Armeen Mahvash, MD, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D Diana Bell (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) C Cheng Z. Liu (NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY) M Mohamed E. Abazeed (Northwestern University, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL) Q Quynh-Thu Xuan Le (Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA) S Sue S. Yom (Department of Radiation Oncology University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA)

Abstract

TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

S

Stephen Yenzen Lai

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

K

Kristopher Attwood

NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA

S

Steven S. Chang

Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI

S

Saad A. Khan

Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA

N

Neal Dunlap

The James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

B

Beth Michelle Beadle

Stanford University, Stanford, CA

R

Rathan M. Subramaniam

Dunedin Hospital and University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand

J

Jian Qin Yu

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

V

Val J. Lowe

M

Minh Tam Truong

Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA

N

Nataliya Kovalchuk

Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Y

Yi Rong

S

Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath

Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath, PhD, Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ahmed Kaseb, MD and Milind Javle, MD, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Marnix GEH Lam, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Armeen Mahvash, MD, Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

Diana Bell

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

C

Cheng Z. Liu

NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY

M

Mohamed E. Abazeed

Northwestern University, The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL

Q

Quynh-Thu Xuan Le

Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA

S

Sue S. Yom

Department of Radiation Oncology University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA