Novel mechanistic insights for IRAK1 and IRAK4 signaling provide a framework for the development of dual IRAK1 and IRAK4 protacs for MYD88 mutated lymphomas.

X Xia Liu S Shirong Liu A Amanda Kofides (1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) D Dominic Pizzarella (1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) J Jinhua Wang S Sara Buhrlage N Nickolas Tsakmaklis (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) A Abigail Peachey (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) A Alberto Guijosa (1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) H Hao Sun M Maria Luisa Guerrera (1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) C Christopher Patterson (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) S Shayna Sarosiek (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) J Jorge Castillo (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) Z Zachary Hunter (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) J John Hatcher (1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States) S Steven Treon (5Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA)

Abstract

Abstract Background: MYD88 mutations are found in patients with various B-cell cancers including Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM; 95-97%), ABC Subtype of Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma (30-40%), Primary Central Nervous Lymphoma (80%), Marginal Zone Lymphoma (10%) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (5-10%). Both BTK and IRAK1/IRAK4 are triggered by mutated MYD88 (Yang et al, BLOOD 2013). While BTK is dependent on HCK for its activation, IRAK1 and IRAK4 remain independent of HCK and BTK (Yang et al, BLOOD 2016). Consistent with these benchtop observations, both IRAK1 and IRAK4 remained active and supported survival of primary bone marrow WM cells in patients who received 6 months of treatment with the BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib on a clinical trial (NCT01614821). IRAK1 and IRAK4 may therefore contribute to the intrinsic resistance of BTK-inhibitors. However, the relative impact of scaffold vs. kinase function on pro-survival signaling for either IRAK1 or IRAK4 remains unclear and is critical to understanding the development of kinase inhibitors vs. PROTACs for development of therapeutics targeting MYD88 mutated lymphomas. Methods: We performed knockdown (KD) experiments using an inducible lentiviral short hairpin RNA expression vector tet-pLKO-puro containing a tetracycline-regulated expression cassette targeting IRAK1 or IRAK4 in MYD88 mutated BCWM.1 and TMD8 cells with puromycin selection. KD experiments and replacement with either wild-type or kinase dead IRAK1 or IRAK4 was accomplished by lentiviral transduction with a pLVX-EF1α-IRES-Puro vector. Immunoblotting was used to confirm protein expression and to evaluate downstream signaling. The CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay was used to assess proliferation and apoptosis analysis was performed using Annexin V/Propidium Iodide staining. Results: KD of IRAK1 or IRAK4 resulted in decreased in proliferation and survival of MYD88 mutated lymphoma cells as well as reduction in p-NFKB-p65 and p-IKBa, though the effects were more pronounced with the KD of IRAK1. Unexpectedly, p-ERK signaling was greatly augmented following KD of either IRAK1 or IRAK4 which could be blocked by the BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib. Treatment of IRAK1 or IRAK4 KD BCWM.1 or TMD8 cells with ibrutinib also triggered greatly increased apoptosis. To clarify kinase vs. scaffold functions that contributed to the above findings, replacement experiments were performed following KD of either IRAK1 or IRAK4. Replacement with wild-type versus kinase dead IRAK1 or IRAK4 more fully reconstituted NFKB-p65 activity. Conversely, replacement with either wild-type or kinase dead IRAK1 or IRAK4 abolished p-ERK activity consistent with a scaffold function for the suppression of ERK activation following KD of either IRAK1 or IRAK4. Given the importance of both kinase and scaffold function for both IRAK1 and IRAK4, we utilized a novel bifunctional proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) JH-XIII-05 that we recently developed and characterized [Hatcher et al, Blood 2024; 144 (Suppl 1): 4359]. JH-XIII-05 exhibited potent and highly selective kinase inhibition and degradation of IRAK1 and IRAK4 and showed superior anti-proliferative and apoptotic activity versus its non-degrading analogue JH-XI-82-01. Importantly, combination treatment of MYD88 mutated lymphoma cells with JH-XIII-05 and ibrutinib abrogated NFKB and ERK activity and showed synergistic activity at most doses.Conclusions: Both IRAK1 and IRAK4 contribute to NFKB pro-survival signaling in MYD88 mutated lymphoma cells which is dependent on their respective kinase activity. Loss of IRAK1 or IRAK4 scaffold triggered BTK mediated ERK activation consistent with a previously unrecognized stress response to blocking IRAK1 and IRAK4 NFKB survival signaling in MYD88 mutated lymphomas. Use of the bifunctional PROTAC JH-XIII-05 blocked the kinase activity and degraded both IRAK1 and IRAK4 and showed synergistic killing of MYD88 mutated lymphoma cells. Our studies provide novel mechanistic insights for IRAK1 and IRAK4 signaling and a framework for the development of dual IRAK1 and IRAK4 PROTACS for MYD88 mutated lymphomas.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5324-5324
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

X

Xia Liu

S

Shirong Liu

A

Amanda Kofides

1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

D

Dominic Pizzarella

1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

J

Jinhua Wang

S

Sara Buhrlage

N

Nickolas Tsakmaklis

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

A

Abigail Peachey

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

A

Alberto Guijosa

1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

H

Hao Sun

M

Maria Luisa Guerrera

1Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

C

Christopher Patterson

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

S

Shayna Sarosiek

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

J

Jorge Castillo

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

Z

Zachary Hunter

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

J

John Hatcher

1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bing Center for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia, Boston, United States

S

Steven Treon

5Bing Center for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA