Non-operative management in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) esophagogastric cancer (EGC) following immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI).
Abstract
4078 Background: ICI achieves deep and durable responses in patients with dMMR and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) EGC, creating an opportunity for non-operative management (NOM) of localized disease. However, limited data exists regarding long-term outcomes with NOM and factors associated with ICI failure, which we evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Methods: We identified patients with EGC managed at MSK from 2007-2025 whose tumors were dMMR by IHC or MSI-H by next generation sequencing and analyzed patient/tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes in those who received curative-intent therapy (systemic therapy and/or surgery; ICI was first introduced in 2018). Clinical complete response (cCR) was defined as the absence of disease by available clinical, radiographic, and endoscopic assessment. Results: A total of 211 patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H EGC were identified, with median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 24-77). Primary tumor sites were stomach (71%), GE junction (17%), and esophagus (12%). Among 122 patients who underwent germline testing, 15 (12%) had Lynch syndrome. Initial treatment was upfront surgery in 85 patients (40%), chemotherapy (chemo) in 68 (32%), ICI alone in 44 (21%), and chemo/ICI in 14 (7%). Among 58 patients treated with ICI +/- chemo, 27 (47%) achieved a cCR. 6 patients underwent surgery despite cCR, with pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 4/6 (67%); pCR rate in those without cCR was 3/16 (19%), yielding an overall pCR rate of 32%, higher than the pCR rate observed with chemo alone (5/48 [10%]). 21 patients elected for NOM after cCR; among those with ≥1 year of follow-up, 16 of 17 (94%) remain alive and surgery-free at 1 year. cCR rates were similar between those receiving ICI alone (45%) and chemo/ICI (50%). Notably, 2/2 (100%) patients treated with dual ICI therapy achieved cCR. Lower cCR rates were observed in patients with shorter time on ICI therapy (5/17 [29%] with ≤3 months of ICI vs 14/30 [47%] with > 3 and < 6 months vs 8/11 [73%] with ≥6 months) and in those with clinical nodal involvement (6/17 [35%] vs 14/19 [74%] in N0); 3 patients who underwent surgery had pCR at tumor but residual nodal disease. cCR rate was also numerically lower in the 19% of patients with MMR heterogeneity, defined by focal loss of MMR proteins on IHC or discordant MMR status between tissue specimens (4/11 [36%] vs 23/47 [49%] in non-heterogeneous cases). Conclusions: In this MSK cohort, ICI induced deep responses in nearly half of patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H EGC. Patients achieving cCR who pursued NOM demonstrated excellent outcomes, with most remaining surgery-free at 1 year, supporting the viability of NOM after careful multidisciplinary review.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (13)
Charlton Tsai
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Joanne Chou
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Marinela Capanu
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Emma Schatoff
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Amitabh Srivastava
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Samuel Louis Cytryn
Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
David Herman Ilson
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Benoit Rousseau
Andrea Cercek
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Yelena Y. Janjigian
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Luis A. Diaz
Steven Brad Maron
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY