Non-monotonic energy dependence of vibrational quenching in I(2 <i>P</i> 3/2) + HBr( <i>X</i> 1Σ+) collisions: Roles of transition-state topology and nonadiabatic effects

H Hanzi Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of MOE, School of Chemistry, Nanjing University 1 , Nanjing 210023,) W Weigao Xu X Xixi Hu (Kuang Yaming Honors School) S Shanyu Han (International Center for Isotope Effects Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University 3 , Nanjing 210023,) D Daiqian Xie (Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering)

Abstract

Quasi-classical trajectory and trajectory surface hopping calculations on the I(2P3/2) + HBr(X1Σ+) system reveal a pronounced non-monotonic energy dependence of the vibrational quenching cross section. This dependence is driven by a frustrated-reaction mechanism, in which trajectories access the region near the reactive transition state but retreat without reaction. On the adiabatic aX̃1 potential energy surface, the mechanism decomposes into competing trapping-, rebounding-, and glancing-type pathways, whose interplay produces distinct peaks. The resulting vibrational energy transfer is, therefore, governed by reactive-like dynamics rather than impulsive short-range collisions, representing a clear breakdown of the Landau–Teller picture. In contrast, on the aX̃2 surface, the higher effective barrier restricts access to the transition-state region, resulting in a monotonic energy dependence governed by threshold behavior. The inclusion of nonadiabatic effects mediated by a conical intersection activates highly efficient quenching for trajectories starting on the aX̃2 surface and alters the high-collisional-energy behavior for those starting on the aX̃1 surface. These results demonstrate that the interplay between transition-state topology and nonadiabatic coupling is a key factor controlling vibrational energy transfer and suggest that similar non-Landau–Teller behavior may be a general feature of heavy–light–heavy systems.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 164, Issue 13
Published April 07, 2026
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (5)

H

Hanzi Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of MOE, School of Chemistry, Nanjing University 1 , Nanjing 210023,

W

Weigao Xu

X

Xixi Hu

Kuang Yaming Honors School

S

Shanyu Han

International Center for Isotope Effects Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University 3 , Nanjing 210023,

D

Daiqian Xie

Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering