Non-invasive strategy for gastric cancer detection: Integration of cell-free DNA fragmentomics and protein biomarkers.

L Lian Lian (Department of Oncology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, Suzhou, China) Y Yueqing Huang X Xuefei Xu (Center for Combustion Energy, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, and Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education) N Nannan Jiang W Wei Zhang H Haihua Shi Q Qiaonan Duan (Department of Clinical and Translational Medicine, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China) C Chong Zhou (Department of Radiation Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China) X Xianmin Li X Xiaoming Shen (National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China) Q Qinghao Tan (Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China) S Shuguang Han F Fan Zheng (School of Physical Science and Technology) Y Ying Wang X Xiaoya Xu (Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University) D Dongyu Liu J Jian Wang D Dadong Zhang M Min Huang W Wenjie Wang (State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Low-Carbon Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

4071 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) ranks the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Although gastroscopy is widely acknowledged as the gold standard for GC detection, its invasiveness limits its utility in large-scale screening. Accurate, non-invasive diagnostic modalities are urgently needed. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomics has emerged as a promising tool for cancer detection. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel non-invasive model for GC detection based on cfDNA fragmentomics and protein biomarkers. Methods: A total of 257 participants, comprising 120 GC patients and 137 non-cancer individuals, were enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n = 129) and a test cohort (n = 128). Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing was performed on plasma cfDNA. We evaluated eight multi-dimensional cfDNA fragmentomics features individually, and selected four, including fragment size ratio, copy number variation, 9-bp end motif, and fragment size at transcription starting sites, to build an ensemble model (GaFraD) to detect GC. Furthermore, conventional protein biomarkers of GC were assessed and integrated with GaFraD model to generate a CONFIRM model aimed at improving diagnostic performance. Results: The GaFraD model achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.953 (95% CI: 0.918 – 0.979) in the training cohort and 0.970 (95% CI: 0.944 – 0.990) in the test cohort, with a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 80.9%. By incorporating protein biomarkers CA19-9 and PG-I/PG-II, the CONFIRM model further reached an AUC of 0.967 (95% CI: 0.929 – 0.992) in the training cohort and 0.986 (95% CI: 0.966 – 1.000) in the test cohort, attaining a sensitivity of 95.0% and specificity of 95.6%. Moreover, the CONFIRM model also exhibited remarkable performance in discriminating early-stage GC patients from controls (AUC = 0.983, sensitivity: 95.6%, specificity: 94.2%). Conclusions: Our model exhibits high discriminatory power in distinguishing GC patients from controls, highlighting the strong clinical potential of combining cfDNA fragmentomics with protein biomarkers for non-invasive, early GC detection. This approach offers a promising pathway towards earlier, accurate, and non-invasive clinical diagnosis of GC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4071-4071
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

L

Lian Lian

Department of Oncology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, Suzhou, China

Y

Yueqing Huang

X

Xuefei Xu

Center for Combustion Energy, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, and Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education

N

Nannan Jiang

W

Wei Zhang

H

Haihua Shi

Q

Qiaonan Duan

Department of Clinical and Translational Medicine, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China

C

Chong Zhou

Department of Radiation Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China

X

Xianmin Li

X

Xiaoming Shen

National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China

Q

Qinghao Tan

Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

S

Shuguang Han

F

Fan Zheng

School of Physical Science and Technology

Y

Ying Wang

X

Xiaoya Xu

Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University

D

Dongyu Liu

J

Jian Wang

D

Dadong Zhang

M

Min Huang

W

Wenjie Wang

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Low-Carbon Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China