Nivolumab and ipilimumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Final results from SOGUG-VEXILLUM trial.

G Guillermo de Velasco I Iciar García Carbonero (Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain) C Carlos Álvarez-Fernández (Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain) R Rebeca Lozano (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca; Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain) U Urbano Anido Herranz (University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain) O Oscar Reig (Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain) F Francisco José Álvarez-Márquez (Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain) P Pablo Gajate (Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain) M Marina Justo (Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain) A Alberto Torres E Eduardo Pujol (Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain) A Aina Iranzo (Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Alzira (Valencia), Spain)

Abstract

747 Background: The pioneering study was designed when platinum-based chemotherapy was the standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma and evaluated whether dual ICI (CTL4-PD1) could improve the benefit of maintenance therapy in this setting. Methods: This unique single-arm, multicentre study included patients with unresectable urothelial cancer that did not progress after first-line platinum-based CT (at least 4-6 cycles). The study treatment consisted of four cycles of ipilimumab (ipi) 3 mg/kg and nivo 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W), followed by nivolumab (nivo) maintenance therapy (Q4W). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of maintenance therapy in the overall and PD-L1 positive populations. Sample size was estimated using a Simon II stage design for the 4-months PFS rate (H0= 40%; H1= 60%; α = 0.05; β = 90%), requiring 25 patients in the 1st stage and up to 66 in total. Here, we report the final results of the study, which met the criteria to proceed to the second stage but was prematurely closed following the emergence of a new standard of care (enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab) in this setting. Results: From Sep 2022 to Apr 2024, 25 patients were included and received nivolumab and ipilimumab maintenance after first-line CT with gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in 14 patients (56%) or carboplatin in 11 (44%). The median age was 64 years (range: 53-79) and most were male (80%). At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 24 months (95% CI: 7-25.3), the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 36% (95% CI: 21.4-60.7) and 28% (95% CI: 14.9-52.5), respectively, and the median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-not reached [NR]). The median OS was 27.4 months (95% CI: 10.1-NR), with 64% (95% CI: 47.7-85.9) and 60% (95% CI: 43.6-82.6) patients alive at 1- and 2-years from the start of nivo/ipi, respectively. Five patients (20%) completed the scheduled 2 years of treatment. Nivo and ipi were permanently discontinued due to toxicity in 4 patients (16%). Grade ≥3 toxicities were observed in 10 patients (40%), with the most common being elevated ALT/AST (12%), immune-mediated hepatitis (8%), and diarrhea (8%). Conclusions: Despite the limited sample size, dual ICI maintenance with nivo plus ipi achieved durable disease control, with 60% of patients alive at 2 years, numerically exceeding historical outcomes from PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The signal supports further exploration of dual ICI as a potential maintenance strategy in this disease. Comprehensive spatial transcriptomics and microbiome analyses are ongoing and will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05219435 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 747-747
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

G

Guillermo de Velasco

I

Iciar García Carbonero

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain

C

Carlos Álvarez-Fernández

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain

R

Rebeca Lozano

Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca; Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain

U

Urbano Anido Herranz

University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain

O

Oscar Reig

Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

F

Francisco José Álvarez-Márquez

Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain

P

Pablo Gajate

Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain

M

Marina Justo

Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain

A

Alberto Torres

E

Eduardo Pujol

Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain

A

Aina Iranzo

Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Alzira (Valencia), Spain