Nivolumab and ipilimumab as second or later line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study.

J Jiliang Qiu (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China) C Chenwei Wang (State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Engineering Research Center of Photoenergy Utilization for Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University (CCNU), 152 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P. R. China) Z Zongfeng Wu (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China) W Wei He Y Yichuan Yuan (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center) Z Zhenkun Huang (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center) B Binkui Li (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center) Y Yunfei Yuan (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center)

Abstract

e16167 Background: Despite advances in first-line for systemic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), tumor progression remains common. However, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) as second or later line treatment in HCC remains limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive HCC patients who received NIVO (1mg/kg) and IPI (3mg/kg) every 3 weeks as later-line between Oct 2020 and Jun 2025. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: A total of 49 patients (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B/C: 15/34) were included. Median age was 53 years (range 24–68). And 24, 14, and 11 patients received NIVO+IPI regimen as 2-, 3-, and 4-line therapy, respectively. Prior systemic regimens included PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus anti-VEGF (38.8%), PD-1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI, 42.9%), TKI alone (10.2%), PD-1 inhibitor alone (6.1%) or dual immunotherapy (2.0%). All patients had received prior local treatments. Median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range: 1-20). Among 32 evaluable patients, ORR was 12.5% (4/32) for the whole cohort, including 6.3% (2/32) complete response (CR), with 11.8% (2/17), 20% (2/10) and 0% (0/5) for 2-L, 3-L, and 4-L patients, respectively. And DCR was 56.3% (18/32) for the whole cohort, with 58.8% (10/17), 50% (5/10) and 60% (3/5) for 2-L, 3-L, and 4-L patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 12 months, median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 2.0–4.2); the median duration of response was 3.4 months. The median OS was not reached, and 6, 12-month OS rates were 96.4% (95% CI 89.8%-100%) and 84.4% (95% CI 64.3%-100%). TRAEs of any grade occurred in 36.8% (18/49) and grade 3–4 TRAEs in 20.4% (10/49). The most common immune-related events were hepatitis (8.2%) and dermatitis (6.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 4.1% (2/49), and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of HCC progressing on systemic and local therapies, NIVO+IPI demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and manageable toxicity as later line therapy. These data support NIVO+IPI as a viable salvage treatment option in the later line setting and warrant prospective evaluation.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

J

Jiliang Qiu

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

C

Chenwei Wang

State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Engineering Research Center of Photoenergy Utilization for Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University (CCNU), 152 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P. R. China

Z

Zongfeng Wu

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

W

Wei He

Y

Yichuan Yuan

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Z

Zhenkun Huang

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

B

Binkui Li

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Y

Yunfei Yuan

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center