Next-generation sequencing in patients with liposarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma.

A Akshee Batra (University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/Jackson Health System, Miami, FL) A Aneesha Raj (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) A Amrit Paudel (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) B Brandon Edward Rose (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) P Priya Chattopadhyay (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL) X Xena Xiaoshu Zheng (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) A Aditi Dhir (University of Miami Miller School of Medicine/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) J Julie Grossman (University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) E Erik Geiger (University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) E Emily E. Jonczak (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) J Jonathan C. Trent (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL) G Gina Z. D'Amato (University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL)

Abstract

e23527 Background: Identifying targetable oncogenic drivers and resistance mechanisms by Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is critical in most cancers, including rare soft tissue sarcomas (STS) like liposarcoma (LPS) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Methods: We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective study at Sylvester Cancer Center to assess NGS use in STS, focusing on LPS and RMS. Medical records from January 2015 to June 2024 were reviewed, and data on demographics, cancer stage, NGS, and survival were collected. Cox Regression Analysis calculated the odds ratios for metastasis at initial presentation, treatment progression, remission after initial intervention, and mortality. Results: NGS was evaluated in 50 out of 117 LPS patients and 35 out of 48 RMS cases. The majority of patients were white and non-Hispanic ethnicity in both LPS and RMS data (88%; 72% vs 71.4%; 51.4%, respectively). Most LPS cases were 54% dedifferentiated, followed by 16% pleomorphic pathology. 60% of cases had progression of LPS on treatment, 52% had distant metastasis, and mortality was 42%. In RMS, 57.2% had progressive disease, 62.8% had distant metastasis and 45.7% mortality. Remission after initial intervention was found in 22.9% of LPS and 24% of RMS cases with NGS. Sixty-four mutations were found in LPS NGS cases, with the CDK4 gene being the most common. TP53 mutation was associated with distant metastasis (OR = 4.89; p = 0.06) and progression (OR = 15.6; p = 0.03) in LPS. FRS2 was associated with remission (OR = 12.8; p = 0.03) after initial treatment with surgery alone or combined with radiation and/ or chemotherapy. In RMS cases with NGS, TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene. Targetable mutation with PI3Kinase/PTEN and FGFR genes were observed at 6.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on histology with LPS and RMS is pending and will be updated by April 2025. Conclusions: TP53 is associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis at initial presentation and progression of disease despite treatment. Given the rarity of LPS and RMS, further research is needed to explore the prognostic utility of mutations. STS Type Most common reported genetic variant Percentage Metastasis at presentation Progression despite treatment Remission after initial treatment Mortality related to STS OR p OR p OR p OR p LPSNGS reported in 42.7% cases (50/117) CDK4 16.50% 1.81 0.39 4.1 0.13 - - 0.62 0.28 MDM2 15.90% 1.6 0.41 1.5 0.56 - - 1.52 0.48 HMGA2 6.80% 1.06 0.93 1.2 0.82 1.93 0.52 0.98 0.98 TP53 5.70% 4.89 0.06 15.6 0.03 0.41 0.39 2.5 0.21 FRS2 3.40% 0.18 0.17 0.34 0.28 12.8 0.03 0.8 0.85 RMSNGS reported in 72.9% cases (35/48) TP53 13.40% 4.01 0.08 3.36 0.11 0.39 0.35 1.71 0.44 PI3Kinase/PTEN 6.40% 1.22 0.83 0.71 0.71 3.69 0.43 1.23 0.82 FGFR 5.50% - - 2.47 0.46 1.04 0.97 1.48 0.72 PAX3-FOXO1 Fusion 3.70% 1.89 0.61 0.72 0.76 0.84 0.92 0.40 0.58 PIK3CA 3.70% 1.89 0.61 2.47 0.46 - - 4.15 0.24 CDK4 3.70% - - 2.47 0.46 1.28 0.86 0.92 0.94

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

A

Akshee Batra

University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/Jackson Health System, Miami, FL

A

Aneesha Raj

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

A

Amrit Paudel

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

B

Brandon Edward Rose

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

P

Priya Chattopadhyay

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

X

Xena Xiaoshu Zheng

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

A

Aditi Dhir

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

J

Julie Grossman

University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

E

Erik Geiger

University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

E

Emily E. Jonczak

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

J

Jonathan C. Trent

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL

G

Gina Z. D'Amato

University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL