Neoadjuvant penpulimab combined with taxanes and carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer: Updated efficacy and safety results from the phase II NeoTAPPL study.

G Guozhi Zhang W Wenting Yan L Long Yuan (Department of Chemical Physics) J Jing Liu L Lin Ren (College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Wenzhou University) D Dandan Ma (State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering) J Jun Deng (Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research) Y Yan Liang (State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, School of Chemistry) Y Ye Zhang J Jun Jiang (State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Chemistry and Materials Science) Y Yi Zhang X Xiaowei Qi X Xiaxin Guo (Clinical Medicine Research Center, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, China) C Chaoyi Wang Q Qinwen Pan (Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University; Key Laboratory of Chongqing Health Commission for Minimally Invasive and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer, Chongqing, China) M Minghao Wang (State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Materials Science) J Jiaqi Zhang Q Qiang Wang

Abstract

600 Background: The KEYNOTE-522 and IMpassion031 trials established that adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In our previously reported phase II NeoTAPPL trial, an anthracycline-free neoadjuvant regimen of penpulimab (anti-PD-1 antibody), carboplatin, and taxanes demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety. Here, we present updated efficacy and safety outcomes from the full trial cohort. Methods: In this open-label, multi-center phase II study, patients with untreated, histologically confirmed TNBC in stage II-III were enrolled. Patients received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with penpulimab (200 mg, d1, q3w) plus taxanes (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and carboplatin (AUC=6, d1, q3w). Patients who either completed or discontinued the neoadjuvant treatment would undergo breast surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy were at the discretion of the treating physician, and radiation therapy was per standard of care. The primary endpoint was the rate of pCR based on the definition of ypT0/Tis ypN0. Secondary endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AE), and immune response biomarkers. Results: 64 patients were enrolled, all of whom received neoadjuvant treatment and underwent surgery. The median age was 53 years (range, 32-73). At diagnosis, 54 patients (84.4%) had stage II disease. pCR was achieved in 41 of 64 patients (64.1%; 95% CI, 51.1%-75.7%), and 50 patients (78.1%; 95% CI, 66.0%-87.5%) achieved RCB 0-1. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 93.8% (95% CI, 84.8%-98.3%) and 98.4% (95% CI, 91.6%-100%), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed pCR rates of 64.8% (35/54) in patients with stage II disease and 60.0% (6/10) in those with stage III disease. The pCR rate was 64.9% (24/37) in node-negative patients and 63.0% (17/27) in node-positive patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in all 64 patients, with grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in 24 patients (37.5%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were alopecia (20.3%), anemia (14.1%), neutropenia (10.9%), and leukopenia (10.9%). Conclusions: The NeoTAPPL trial demonstrates that an anthracycline-free neoadjuvant regimen is an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with TNBC. The regimen achieved a high pCR rate, which remained consistent across key prognostic subgroups, including disease stage and nodal status. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2300071925 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 600-600
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

G

Guozhi Zhang

W

Wenting Yan

L

Long Yuan

Department of Chemical Physics

J

Jing Liu

L

Lin Ren

College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Wenzhou University

D

Dandan Ma

State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering

J

Jun Deng

Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research

Y

Yan Liang

State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, School of Chemistry

Y

Ye Zhang

J

Jun Jiang

State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, School of Chemistry and Materials Science

Y

Yi Zhang

X

Xiaowei Qi

X

Xiaxin Guo

Clinical Medicine Research Center, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, China

C

Chaoyi Wang

Q

Qinwen Pan

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University; Key Laboratory of Chongqing Health Commission for Minimally Invasive and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer, Chongqing, China

M

Minghao Wang

State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Materials Science

J

Jiaqi Zhang

Q

Qiang Wang