Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with resectable stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma: A Swedish retrospective real-world study (NEO-MEL).
Abstract
e21563 Background: Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant administration of PD-1 +/- CTLA-4 inhibitor is superior to adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors in patients with resectable stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma. However, the generalizability of these results to an unselected patient population treated in routine clinical settings remains unclear. Methods: A population-based study was conducted across three academic centers in Sweden, including all patients with macroscopic resectable cutaneous melanoma treated with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor/-s (ICI) in the corresponding regions from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2024. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records. Results: A total of 118 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 71 years, with 69% having lymph node metastases (LN), 16% in-transit (ITM), 9% ITM and LN and 7% had stage IV disease. Patients received a median of two treatments of neoadjuvant ICI, 98% received nivolumab monotherapy, and 88% underwent surgery as planned. Among all patients who started treatment, 42% experienced a major pathological response (MPR), 9% a partial pathological response (pPR) and 31% no pathological response (pNR). The administration of adjuvant ICI treatment varied, and 18% of the patients with a MPR received no adjuvant treatment. At a median follow-up time of 12 months, the estimated 12-month event-free survival was 72% (95% CI, 63-82) and the recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 74% (95% CI, 65-83). The estimated 12-month RFS was 94% in patients with a MPR, 91% among those with a pPR, and 61% among those with a pNR. Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients. Conclusions: Early adoption of neoadjuvant ICI therapy in patients with resectable stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma treated in population-based routine clinical practice was feasible and provided beneficial efficacy and safety outcomes, similar to those seen in clinical trials.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Axel Nelson
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ellen Krabbe
University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Karl Björksrtöm
Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Braslav Jovanovic
Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Christian U. Blank
Gustav J. Ullenhag
Uppsala University and Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Hildur Helgadottir
Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Lars Ny
Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Roger Olofsson Bagge