Neoadjuvant DAN-222 plus niraparib in high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 adaptive platform trial.

K Kay T. Yeung (UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA) C Claudine Isaacs M Marissa Howard-Mcnatt (Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC) C Christina Yau J Jo Chien (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) A Anne M. Wallace (UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA) J Judy Caroline Boughey (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) H Hyo S. Han V Virginia F. Borges (University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO) C Carla Isadora Falkson (Department of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY) D Douglas Yee C Coral Omene (Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ) R Rita Nanda A Andrew Chapple (Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA) J Jane Perlmutter (Gemini Group, Ann Arbor, MI) P Paula R. Pohlmann A Alexander D. Borowsky W W. Fraser Symmans (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX) L Laura van't Veer (Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Laura Esserman (Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA)

Abstract

625 Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter phase II adaptive platform trial evaluating novel agents for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer using response-predictive subtypes (RPS) and a sequential neoadjuvant treatment design of up to three blocks (A/B/C). Investigational regimens are given in Block A, followed by response-guided escalation to standard-of-care (SOC) therapy (tx) in subsequent blocks or early surgery for responders. Topoisomerase I (TOPO1) inhibition plus PARP inhibition may enhance DNA damage and tumor response. DAN-222 is a tumor-targeted polymeric camptothecin conjugate designed to improve the therapeutic index of TOPO1 inhibition. Based on favorable phase 1 safety and preliminary activity in metastatic breast cancer, DAN-222 plus niraparib was evaluated as Block A tx in HER2− disease. Notably, the neoadjuvant regimen used a higher dose of niraparib (200 mg daily) than the prior phase 1 metastatic study. Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2− breast cancer were randomized to DAN-222 plus niraparib for up to 12 weeks in Block A. Response was assessed by serial MRI and biopsy. Inadequate responders escalated early to SOC tx in Blocks B/C. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included residual cancer burden, safety, early discontinuation, and treatment-strategy performance versus subtype-specific SOC tx controls. Given established PARPi sensitivity in BRCA mut disease, the key objective was to assess clinically meaningful activity of DAN-222 plus niraparib in BRCA wt pts. Accordingly, a prespecified Bayesian interim futility analysis focused on BRCA wt and tested the probability of the true pCR rate after Block A alone exceeded 15% after 50 pts. Results: Fifty pts enrolled from Sep to Dec 2024. In BRCA wt (n=47), estimated Block A pCR was 3%, with posterior probability of 0.02 that that true pCR exceeded 15%, meeting futility criteria and prompting arm closure. Across all blocks, pCR rate was 57% (8/14) for HR-HER2−; 11% (4/36) for HR+ HER2−, largely after SOC tx. 2/3 BRCA mut pts achieved pCR. Treatment strategies initiating with DAN-222 plus niraparib underperformed subtype-specific controls. 68% discontinued Block A early, mainly due to toxicity. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were common: neutropenia (n=25; 50%), anemia (24%), and thrombocytopenia (18%). Cystitis occurred in 36% (1 grade ≥3). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant DAN-222 plus niraparib showed insufficient activity and no treatment-strategy benefit in BRCA wt HER2− breast cancer, underscoring challenges for TOPO1–PARP inhibitor combinations. Although not supported for further development in this setting, these results highlight the strength of I-SPY 2 in rapidly enrolling patients and quickly distinguishing ineffective from promising therapeutic strategies to accelerate progress toward improved outcomes for patients with curable breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 625-625
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

K

Kay T. Yeung

UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA

C

Claudine Isaacs

M

Marissa Howard-Mcnatt

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC

C

Christina Yau

J

Jo Chien

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

A

Anne M. Wallace

UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA

J

Judy Caroline Boughey

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

H

Hyo S. Han

V

Virginia F. Borges

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO

C

Carla Isadora Falkson

Department of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

D

Douglas Yee

C

Coral Omene

Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ

R

Rita Nanda

A

Andrew Chapple

Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA

J

Jane Perlmutter

Gemini Group, Ann Arbor, MI

P

Paula R. Pohlmann

A

Alexander D. Borowsky

W

W. Fraser Symmans

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX

L

Laura van't Veer

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Laura Esserman

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA