Neoadjuvant dalpiciclib combined with letrozole and dual HER2 blockade in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer: First-stage results of the HELEN HER2 017 trial.
Abstract
1054 Background: Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC; HR+/HER2+) represents a distinct subtype with suboptimal responses to conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with anti-HER2 therapy, with reported pCR rates of only 26%–43.8%, and is associated with significant treatment-related toxicities 1-3 . This highlights an urgent need for more effective and less toxic therapeutic strategies. We hypothesize that simultaneously targeting ER, HER2, and CDK4/6 pathways may enhance antitumor efficacy while enabling chemotherapy de-escalation. This phase II study investigates a response-guided, chemotherapy-free neoadjuvant regimen using dalpiciclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor), aromatase inhibitor (AI), and dual HER2 blockade. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, two-stage Simon optimal design study planned to enroll 71 patients. In stage one, 20 patients were enrolled; proceeding to stage two required ≥6 pCRs. The final success threshold is ≥24 pCRs in 71 patients (α=0.05, power=80%, H0: pCR≤25% vs. H1: pCR≥40%). Eligible patients had stage II–IIIa HR+/HER2+ invasive breast cancer. Treatment included oral dalpiciclib (150 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off), oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day; with ovarian suppression if premenopausal), and IV trastuzumab (loading 8 mg/kg, then 6 mg/kg) plus pertuzumab (loading 840 mg, then 420 mg) every 3 weeks. This was a response-adaptive design: after 2 cycles, MRI assessed tumor response. Patients achieving PR (≥30% reduction per RECIST 1.1) continued the same regimen for 6 cycles; non-responders switched to TCHP chemotherapy (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, pertuzumab). The primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) in the all-treated population. Secondary endpoints included ORR, RCB 0-1, EFS, and safety. Results: In the first stage, 20 patients were enrolled. Median age was 48 years (range 34–59). All were ER+ and HER2+ by central review. After 2 cycles, 15 of 20 patients (75%) achieved PR and continued on the dalpiciclib, letrozole, and dual HER2 blockade regimen. Of the 20 patients, 8 achieved pCR, with a rate of 40%. Among the MRI responders who continued the experimental arm, the pCR rate was 40% (6/15). Treatment was generally well-tolerated; the most common adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. No treatment-related discontinuations or cardiac toxicity of grade 3 or higher were observed. Conclusions: The first stage of this response-guided study met its predefined efficacy threshold (≥6 pCR in 20 patients). The neoadjuvant regimen combining dalpiciclib, an AI, and dual HER2 blockade shows promising pCR rates and a favorable safety profile in TPBC, supporting continued evaluation in the second stage of the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT06276868 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Jiujun Zhu
Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Zhenduo Lu
Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Junzhao Wu
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Xuhui Guo
Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Jianghua Qiao
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Chengzheng Wang
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Chongjian Zhang
Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Jiao Zhang
Dechuang Jiao
Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Juntao Li
Tian Xie
Lina Wang
Department of Chemistry, Advanced Institute of Future Energy, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, State Key Laboratory of Porous Materials for Separation and Conversion
Jiabin Wang
Yadong Sun
Yajie Zhao
Zhenzhen Liu