Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

S Stephanie Gaillard (Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD) C Christina Lacchetti (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA) D Deborah K. Armstrong (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) W William A. Cliby M Mitchell I. Edelson (Jefferson Abington Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA) A Agustin A. Garcia (Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA) R Rahel G. Ghebre (University of Minnesota Medical School & St Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical School, Minneapolis, MN) G Gregory M. Gressel (Corewell Health Cancer Center and Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI) J Jamie L. Lesnock (UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA) L Larissa A. Meyer K Kathleen N. Moore (Division of Gynecologic Oncology Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA) R Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Alexander B. Olawaiye R Ritu Salani (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) D Dee Sparacio (Patient Representative, Hightstown, NJ) W Willemien J. van Driel W William P. Tew (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY)

Abstract

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]). METHODS A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review. RESULTS Sixty-one studies form the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration–approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines . This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 7
Published March 01, 2025
Pages 868-891
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

S

Stephanie Gaillard

Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

C

Christina Lacchetti

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

D

Deborah K. Armstrong

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

W

William A. Cliby

M

Mitchell I. Edelson

Jefferson Abington Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

A

Agustin A. Garcia

Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA

R

Rahel G. Ghebre

University of Minnesota Medical School & St Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical School, Minneapolis, MN

G

Gregory M. Gressel

Corewell Health Cancer Center and Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI

J

Jamie L. Lesnock

UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA

L

Larissa A. Meyer

K

Kathleen N. Moore

Division of Gynecologic Oncology Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA

R

Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Alexander B. Olawaiye

R

Ritu Salani

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

D

Dee Sparacio

Patient Representative, Hightstown, NJ

W

Willemien J. van Driel

W

William P. Tew

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY