Neoadjuvant androgen receptor pathway inhibition for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: 5-year survival update and PSMA PET correlatives of the randomized NeoPRO trial.

G Gabriel Berlingieri Polho (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) G Gabriella Soares (Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil) D David Queiroz Borges Muniz (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) R Rafael Ferreira Coelho (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) L Leonardo Cardili F Felipe G. Barbosa (Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil) E Eder Nisi Ilario (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) P Públio Viana (Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil) C Claudio Bovolenta Murta (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) G Giuliano Guglielmetti (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) M Mauricio Cordeiro (Urology Department, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) J Jose Pontes Jr (Urology Department, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) J Jamile Almeida Silva (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) J Jose Mauricio Mota (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) G Guilherme Filaho de Freitas (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) K Katia Ramos Moreira Leite (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) C Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) W William Carlos Nahas (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) D Diogo Assed Bastos (Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

5119 Background: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer remain at elevated risk of recurrence after local therapy. Ongoing trials are investigating neoadjuvant strategies using androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Methods: This phase II trial randomized patients with Gleason ≥ 8 and/or cT3N0-1 and/or PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL to receive either goserelin (ADT) plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP arm) or AAP plus apalutamide (A-APA arm) prior to radical prostatectomy. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (tumor ≤ 0.5 cm). Here we present updated survival data after a median follow-up of 59 months. Biochemical-free survival (BFS) was defined as the time from randomization to PSA > 0.1 ng/mL, metastasis, or death. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was defined as the time from randomization to metastasis or death. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for time-to-event analyses. Results: Sixty-two patients were randomized (AAP = 31; A-APA = 31). Previous results showed no significant difference in the primary endpoint (Bastos D, et al. ASCO 2022). A total of 35 patients experienced biochemical recurrence. No significant difference was observed between the AAP and A-APA arms in 5-year BFS (48% vs 35%, p = 0.55) or MFS (83% vs 84%, p = 0.88). Achieving complete PSMA response on PSMA PET prior to surgery was a significant prognostic factor for improved 5-year BFS (28% vs 66%, p = 0.003) and MFS (74% vs 100%, p = 0.009). A trend toward higher 5-year overall survival (OS) was also observed among those with complete PSMA response (87% vs 100%, p = 0.09). Residual cancer burden ≤ 0.25 cm³ was associated with better 5-year BFS (32% vs 77%, p = 0.008), but not with MFS (79% vs 100%, p = 0.06) or OS (89% vs 100%, p = 0.22). Conclusions: No difference in 5-year BFS or MFS was observed between AAP and A-APA. Complete PSMA response on PSMA PET is a promising prognostic marker and may serve as a surrogate for BFS and MFS after neoadjuvant treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02789878 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5119-5119
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

G

Gabriel Berlingieri Polho

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

G

Gabriella Soares

Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

D

David Queiroz Borges Muniz

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Rafael Ferreira Coelho

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

L

Leonardo Cardili

F

Felipe G. Barbosa

Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

E

Eder Nisi Ilario

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

P

Públio Viana

Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Claudio Bovolenta Murta

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

G

Giuliano Guglielmetti

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

M

Mauricio Cordeiro

Urology Department, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

J

Jose Pontes Jr

Urology Department, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

J

Jamile Almeida Silva

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

J

Jose Mauricio Mota

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

G

Guilherme Filaho de Freitas

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

K

Katia Ramos Moreira Leite

University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

W

William Carlos Nahas

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

D

Diogo Assed Bastos

Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil