Nanosecond vs picosecond: The potential for advanced solar cell processing via pulsed laser technology
Abstract
Pulsed laser technology plays a crucial role in the fabrication of high-efficiency silicon solar cells, especially in enabling sophisticated architectures such as the interdigitated back contact silicon heterojunction cells. Realizing precise laser processing for a wide range of applications in solar cell manufacturing requires an understanding of how the lasing operating parameters affect the materials and fabrication processes. Here, we contrast nanosecond- and picosecond-pulsed UV lasers, studying their ability to enable laser-doped selective emitters and dielectric ablated openings—two major methods for solar cell processing. Lasers are operated in different power density regimes by controlling the pump current. It is shown that the nanosecond-pulsed laser offers great potential for doping, as implied from sheet resistance and dopant concentration profile measurements, but fails to produce melting-free ablation even at very low fluences. On the other hand, precise control of the picosecond laser allows damage-lean dielectric ablation but falls short of producing adequate doping concentrations for solar cell applications, even at high fluences. These results are discussed in the context of the fundamental mechanisms of laser–material interaction as a function of the pulse length. We propose that, via adequate pulse length and power density control, the same pulsed UV laser can be operated to fulfil the technical requirements of different processes in solar cell manufacturing toward higher efficiency devices and improved yield.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Applied Physics
American Institute of Physics
Authors (5)
Tarek O. Abdul Fattah
Department of Materials, University of Oxford 1 , Oxford OX1 3PH,
Jingyan Chen
Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials Design and Application, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering
Shona McNab
School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, University of New South Wales 2 , Sydney 2052,
Peter R. Wilshaw
Department of Materials, University of Oxford 1 , Oxford OX1 3PH,
Ruy S. Bonilla