Mynerva-gimema AML1919 ameliorate Trial: EARLY intensification in FLT3-mutated ACUTE myeloid leukemia based on peripheral blast clearance

F Francesco Mannelli (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) G Giacomo Gianfaldoni (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) A Alfonso Piciocchi (4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy) G Giovanni Marsili (4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy) R Roberto Caporale (5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) E Ernesta Audisio (6SC Ematologia 2, AOU Città della Salute, Ospedale S.G: Battista Molinette, Torino, Italy) A Antonino Mule' (7UOC di Oncoematologia AO Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy) A Alessandro Pulsoni (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome) A Antonio Curti (2IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy) C Crescenza Pasciolla (10IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy) P Patrizia Zappasodi (7Dipartimento di Oncoematologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo., Pavia, Italy) C Chiara Cattaneo (12UO Ematologia, ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy) A Alessia Tieghi (13Ematologia, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy) R Roberto Sartori (14UOC Oncoematologia, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, PO S. Giacomo Apostolo, Castefranco Veneto, Italy) L Luca Frison (15UO Ematologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo, AULSS3 Serenissima, Venezia-Mestre, Italy) F Francesco Albano (14Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy) P Prassede Salutari (17UOC Ematologia PO Santo Spirito, ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy) S Sara Bencini (5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) B Benedetta Peruzzi (5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) M Matteo Piccini (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) B Barbara Scappini (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) F Francesca Crupi (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) G Gaia Ciolli (1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy) L Livia Gorreo Renzulli (4Fondazione GIMEMA, Roma, Italy) M Marco Chiarini (18Flow Cytometry Unit, Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Diagnostic Department, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy) F Francesco Buccisano (23Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome tor Vergata, Rome, Italy) A Adriano Venditti (23Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome tor Vergata, Rome, Italy) P Paola Fazi (4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy) F Francesco Annunziato (3Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy) P Paola Guglielmelli (3Center for Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy) A Alessandro Vannucchi (5Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy)

Abstract

Abstract Background. The aim of intensive induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the achievement of complete remission (CR). After the establishment of “3+7” regimen as the standard induction, several efforts were pursued for improvement through different modalities, among which the increase of anthracycline and cytarabine doses. All these approaches provided a survival advantage in specific subgroups, generally offset by increased toxicity. Since 2017, novel agents have received approval for frontline treatment of selected patient categories, changing the uniform management to a targeted diversification of therapeutic approaches: the incorporation of the FLT3 inhibitor Midostaurin for FLT3-mutated patients, the use of CPX-351 for therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, the implementation of Gemtuzumab ozogamicin prominently in patients with favorable-risk cytogenetics. Nonetheless, induction treatment is still conceived as a single treatment block, the response to which is appreciated only 3-4 weeks after its completion. We previously provided evidence that the kinetics of blast reduction in the peripheral blood (PB) during the first days of “3+7” course might reflect AML chemosensitivity. The analytical approach was based on the quantification of leukemia-associated aberrant immuno-phenotype(s) (LAIP) by multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC) in PB before starting the induction on day 1 (baseline), and daily thereafter up to day 8. We defined the “clearance of peripheral blast cells” (PBC) as the logarithmic ratio between the absolute blast count on the day of chemo start and the values measured daily. In an exploratory cohort of 61 patients, followed by prospective analysis in the of NILG 02-06 randomized clinical trial, we showed the potential of PBC to predict the achievement of CR and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status. Rationale. We reasoned that an early appraisal of chemosensitivity based on PBC might support the modulation of induction regimen. Accordingly, we envisioned to continue standard induction in patients where PBC data predict a good response, while in patients with a low clearance of PB blasts, immediate switching to an intensified induction could be offered. Such a PBC-driven approach is meant to increase the rate of CR, but with lower overall toxicity, by early identification of patients with lower probability to achieve CR. The second component of this personalized approach regards the early assessment of disease-associated risk: based on the correlation of PBC with survival and MRD, PBC-low patients will be considered as high-risk and early allocated to allogeneic HSCT. The rationale is to avoid delaying HSCT and prevent delivering of additional chemotherapy courses that are predicted to have very low chance to improve the response depth. Study design. AMELIORATE is a phase 3, randomized, trial aiming to personalization of treatment in FLT3-mutated AML (EudraCT number 2019-003936-21). The study is sponsored by GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) and co-funded by MYNERVA (MYeloid NEoplasms Research Venture AIRC). Key eligibility criteria are a diagnosis of untreated AML according to WHO 2016 and the presence of FLT3 mutation, either ITD and/or TKD. PBC is calculated on day 4 of induction as a logarithmic ratio between the absolute PB LAIP+ cell count on day 1 (baseline) and on day 4. A threshold of 2.0 log is decisional to assign patients to different arms. Patients with PBC >2 (PBC-high) complete the standard induction course and are managed according to standard practice. Patients with PBC≤2 (PBC-low) are randomized at day 4 between a standard (analogue to PBC-high) and an experimental approach providing two main modifications: the immediate switch to intensified induction with high-doses cytarabine (1500 mg/m2 bid on days 5, 6 and 7); and the early allocation to high-risk category, to be refined later, based on ELN stratification and post-induction MRD status. All patients receive Midostaurin as per standard practice. Event free survival (EFS) is selected as the primary endpoint. Recruitment. Between April 2020 and June 2025, 28 study sites adhered to the trial and 147 FLT3-mut pts were enrolled so far. Based on the expected distribution of patients into PBC-high and PBC-low category, a total of 172 subject is to be recruited to include 86 PBC-low patients suitable for randomization to the conventional and experimental arm

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5243-5243
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (31)

F

Francesco Mannelli

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

G

Giacomo Gianfaldoni

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

A

Alfonso Piciocchi

4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy

G

Giovanni Marsili

4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy

R

Roberto Caporale

5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

E

Ernesta Audisio

6SC Ematologia 2, AOU Città della Salute, Ospedale S.G: Battista Molinette, Torino, Italy

A

Antonino Mule'

7UOC di Oncoematologia AO Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy

A

Alessandro Pulsoni

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome

A

Antonio Curti

2IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy

C

Crescenza Pasciolla

10IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy

P

Patrizia Zappasodi

7Dipartimento di Oncoematologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo., Pavia, Italy

C

Chiara Cattaneo

12UO Ematologia, ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy

A

Alessia Tieghi

13Ematologia, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

R

Roberto Sartori

14UOC Oncoematologia, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, PO S. Giacomo Apostolo, Castefranco Veneto, Italy

L

Luca Frison

15UO Ematologia, Ospedale dell'Angelo, AULSS3 Serenissima, Venezia-Mestre, Italy

F

Francesco Albano

14Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy

P

Prassede Salutari

17UOC Ematologia PO Santo Spirito, ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy

S

Sara Bencini

5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

B

Benedetta Peruzzi

5SOD Diagnostica Citofluorimetrica e Immunologica, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

M

Matteo Piccini

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

B

Barbara Scappini

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

F

Francesca Crupi

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

G

Gaia Ciolli

1SOD Ematologia, Università di Firenze, AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

L

Livia Gorreo Renzulli

4Fondazione GIMEMA, Roma, Italy

M

Marco Chiarini

18Flow Cytometry Unit, Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Diagnostic Department, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy

F

Francesco Buccisano

23Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

A

Adriano Venditti

23Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

P

Paola Fazi

4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy

F

Francesco Annunziato

3Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

P

Paola Guglielmelli

3Center for Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

A

Alessandro Vannucchi

5Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy