Myeloid malignancies molecular analysis for therapy choice (myeloMATCH): Rapid availability of clinical, pathologic and molecular features for treatment assignment in the first 550 patients.
Abstract
Abstract Background: MyeloMATCH is an NCI-sponsored initiative for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) employing a Master Screening and Reassessment Protocol (MSRP) to assign patients (pts) to a pt and disease biology-specific clinical trial. Several trials evaluating initial therapies are currently open, while subsequent trials dedicated to eradicating measurable residual disease during consolidation and including stem cell transplant are being developed. A pt enrolled at diagnosis may be followed longitudinally and be eligible for trials in sequential tiers throughout the treatment course. We report key data concerning the first cohort of pts enrolled on the MSRP. Methods: After pts with suspected AML or MDS consent for the MSRP, blood and marrow are sent to the myeloMATCH Molecular Diagnostics Network (MDNet) of central CLIA labs operating under a single Investigational Device Exemption to rapidly define molecular, cytogenetic, and immunophenotypic characteristics. These data are catalogued by a bioinformatics team (MATCHBox) and reviewed daily to assign participants to an available trial based on pt and disease features. A Tier Advancement Pathway (TAP) allows standard of care therapy with potential for assignment to subsequent myeloMATCH trials. Since activation in May 2024, 550 patients age≥18 were enrolled on the MSRP from 76 institutions: 48 Academic, 14 NCORP, 11 community, 3 VA. There are currently 4 open randomized AML trials (≥age 60 or unfit with mutant FLT3, ≥age 60 IDH2 mutant AML, fit age<60 ELN 2017 intermediate-risk AML, fit age<60 ELN 2017 adverse risk) and 1 MDS trial(IDH2 mutant). Patients not eligible for an open protocol were assigned to TAP. Results: Of the 550 pts consented, 491 completed screening assays; 49 had no or incomplete samples; 10 withdrew before completed analysis. Median cytogenetic turnaround time (TAT) was 69 hours (91% within 72 hours), and median Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) TAT from receipt was 49 hours (95% within 72 hours). Seventy-six pts (of 491 with assay data) were not assigned due to non-AML or non-MDS diagnoses, the most common being: B-ALL [n=11], MPN [9], benign marrow [9], APML [7], and MPAL [6]. The AML/MDS verified cohort was 415 pts, 366 (89.2%) patients with AML (45% age <60) and 49 (11.8%) with MDS. The median age at screening was 63 years (range:18-95) and 186 (45%) were female. Eighty-two percent identified as White, 7.5% Black, 3% Asian, 7% unknown, and 9% as Hispanic. The most frequent mutations in the AML pts were NPM1 (24.0%), DNMT3A (22.7%), TET2 (19.9%), NRAS (18.0%), FLT3 (18.0% ITD, TKD 7.1%), TP53 (14.5%), and CEBPA (8.7%); IDH1/2 mutation rates were 8.2% and 13.7%, respectively. Co-mutations include FLT3/NPM1 (9.8%), NPM1/IDH2 (4.4%), IDH1/2 and any RAS (3.8%). Karyotypes were normal in 40.4%, complex 20.8%, inv(16) 6.0%, MLL/KMT2A 4.6% and t(8;21) 1.9%. 29% had favorable risk disease, 29% intermediate, and 42% adverse (ELN 2017). In MDS, mutations included: TP53 (36.7%), RUNX1 (20.4%) ASXL1 (20.4%), TET2 (18.4%), spliceosome mutations (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1 and ZRSR2, 28.6%) andIDH1/2 in 4.1% and 6.1%, respectively. Karyotypes were normal in 24.5%; complex in 40.8%. By IPSS-R, 2.4% were low, 73.8% intermediate, 2.4% high, and 21.4% very high risk. 82/415 (20%) pts were assigned to initial therapy protocol, with an increase in assignment rate to 44% in the most recent two months. 71/415 pts (16%) were enrolled in one of the MyeloMATCH studies. Three-hundred forty-four pts (80%) were assigned and enrolled to TAP (296 AML, 48 MDS) for potential assignment to subsequent tier trials. In the TAP AML pts, 99 (33%) have completed initial treatment, including intensive chemotherapy (IC) in 62% of pts and hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (HMA/VEN) in 38%. In pts <60 years of age, 87% received IC v. 13% with HMA/VEN, in >60 34% IC v. 66% HMA/VEN and in age 60-75 42% IC v. 58% HMA/Ven. Conclusion: MyeloMATCH has screened over 500 pts from academic and community sites in the US and Canada in 14 months, meeting the TAT goal of sample acquisition to results of <72 hours. Assignment to treatment protocols has substantially increased recently. As additional trials open (12 in development) we expect the percentage of pts enrolled on MSRP who go on to therapeutic trials will markedly increase, thereby allowing a personalized medicine approach for a broad group of US and Canadian adult pts with AML and MDS.
Article Details
Authors (34)
Eric Winer
18Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Megan Othus
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Ehab Atallah
17Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Stephanie Tsai
21Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, United States
Mitchell Sabloff
5The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
Afaf Osman
6University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
Annie Im
9University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Sanam Loghavi
Anna Moseley
2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Public Health Division and SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, United States
Brent Wood
11University of Washington, Seattle, United States
Min Fang
Cecilia Yeung
Xueyan Chen
10Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Xiaoyu Qu
Lyndsay Harris
11National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
Sayak Ghatak
10Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Steven Gore
Geoffrey Uy
18Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
Laura Michaelis
3Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Olatoyosi Odenike
University of Chicago Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago
Richard Stone
Selina Luger
14University of Pennsylvania/ Abrahmson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
Sarit Assouline
7Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
Harry Erba
28Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
Mark Litzow
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Curtis Lachowiez
1Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
John Reagan
2Rhode Island Hospital, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Providence, United States
Uma Borate
2Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Mary Lynn Savoie
21Arthur JE Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
Brian Jonas
2Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Division of Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, Sacramento, United States
Ntasha Roy
9University of Southern California, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
Jerald Radich
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
Richard Little
27National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
Shahanawaz Jiwani
23Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, United States