Mutualisms within light microhabitats are associated with sensory convergence in a mimetic butterfly community

J J. Benito Wainwright (School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) T Theodora Loupasaki (School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) F Francisco Ramírez (Museo de Zoología Quito Católica Zoología, Laboratorio de Entomología, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador) I Iestyn L. Penry-Williams (School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) S Sam J. England (Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol) A Annalie Barker (Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge) J Joana I. Meier (Tree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute) M Martin J. How (School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) N Nicholas W. Roberts (School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol) J Jolyon Troscianko (Centre for Ecology & Evolution, University of Exeter) S Stephen H. Montgomery (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

Abstract

Niche partitioning within variable habitats can expose species to distinct sensory information. Vision is the primary sensory modality used by many animals to interact with their habitat. However, the role of terrestrial light environment properties in shaping species assemblages and visual system evolution is not fully understood. By studying a diverse, sympatric community of mimetic butterflies, we demonstrate that forest architecture creates a mosaic of light microhabitats that drive adaptive sensory convergence and divergence in both peripheral and central sensory systems. Our results show that across the visual system, predictable patterns of evolution characterize how species adapt to the availability of sensory information within their preferred light microhabitat. Our study provides an example of how visual systems consistently respond to their external sensory world, and illustrates the wide-reaching consequences of interspecific mutualisms, such as Müllerian mimicry, on organismal evolution.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 29
Published July 22, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (11)

J

J. Benito Wainwright

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

T

Theodora Loupasaki

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

F

Francisco Ramírez

Museo de Zoología Quito Católica Zoología, Laboratorio de Entomología, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

I

Iestyn L. Penry-Williams

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

S

Sam J. England

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol

A

Annalie Barker

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge

J

Joana I. Meier

Tree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute

M

Martin J. How

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

N

Nicholas W. Roberts

School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol

J

Jolyon Troscianko

Centre for Ecology & Evolution, University of Exeter

S

Stephen H. Montgomery

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol