Multicenter trial of microbubble-enhanced transcranial focused ultrasound (MB-FUS) with monthly adjuvant temozolomide for patients with high-grade gliomas.

G Graeme Woodworth (University of Maryland) P Pavlos Anastasiadis (University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) C Chetan Bettegowda J Jeremi Chabros (Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA) C Chixiang Chen (University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) A Ahmad Ozair J Jakob Gerstl (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) C Chris Douville (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) R Rania Mekary (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA) T Timothy Richard Smith (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) Y Ying Meng (Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences) A Ali Rezai A Arjun Sahgal J James R. Perry (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) J Jason Sheehan D Dheeraj Gandhi N Nathan J. McDannold (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) A Alexandra J. Golby (Harvard Medical School) N Nir Lipsman (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada)

Abstract

2009 Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) have few effective therapies targeting tumor cell recurrence, which remain shielded by blood-brain barrier (BBB). MB-FUS allows for controlled BBB opening (BBBO) enabling localized drug delivery and increased tumor biomarker release into systemic circulation. Methods: MR-guided MB-FUS with real-time feedback was evaluated for HGG patients in multicenter phase 1/2 trial (BT008: NCT03551249, NCT03616860) for adverse events (AEs) and feasibility [primary endpoints], efficacy [secondary endpoint], and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) post-procedure [exploratory]. After resection and 6 weeks of chemoradiation, peri-resectional infiltrative regions were targeted with MB-FUS during monthly adjuvant temozolomide cycles (MB-FUS+TMZ). For efficacy, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared with an external cohort, created using restriction and coarsened exact matching (CEM). Results: Trial cohort had 34 patients enrolled and evaluated from 5 sites in North America. No serious procedure-related AEs were seen, with the most common AEs being mild, self-resolving. BBBO was seen in 100% of treatments, covering 82% targeted volumes with ≤3mm accuracy. Trial cohort had longer mPFS (univariate 13.5 vs. 9.6 months, multivariate HR 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.99, p=0.048) and mOS (36.4 vs. 19.1 months, multivariate HR 0.50, 95%CI: 0.26-0.95, p=0.036), with treatment effect robust in sensitivity analyses. Disease state correlated closely with longitudinal plasma cfDNA changes. Conclusions: MB-FUS+TMZ is a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for HGG, potentially improving survival and enabling longitudinal non-invasive monitoring. Clinical trial information: NCT03551249 , NCT03616860 . Variables Trial cohort Matched Cohort † Patients (N) 34 158 Baseline characteristics used in CEM SMD† Age, years, mean±SD 51.5 ±13.0 51.6 ±13.0 0.0 MGMT, Unmethylated, N (%) 16 (47.1%) 74 (47.1%) 0.0 IDH, Wild type, N (%) 29 (85.3%) 135 (85.3%) 0.0 Characteristics tackled through restriction SMD† Received resection & 6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy 34 (100%) 158 (100%) 0.0 Non-Hispanic, N (%) 34 (100%) 158 (100%) 0.0 Complete resection, N (%) 34 (100%) 158 (100%) 0.0 KPS ≥70 – N (%) 34 (100%) 158 (100%) 0.0 Other characteristics not used in CEM wSMD† Sex, male – N (%) 16 (47.1%) 101 (63.9%) 0.34 Race, White – N (%) 28 (82.4%) 137 (86.7%) 0.13 Preoperative tumor size, median cm 3 (IQR) 19.8 (6.9, 42.9) 47.0 [30.0, 53.0) 0.61 Clinical Outcomes P Unadjusted mOS, months (95%CI) 36.4 (21.1, NR) 19.1 (16.2, 22.8) <0.001 OS HR for treatment adjusted for tumor size, IDH, & MGMT (95%CI) 0.50 (0.26, 0.95) 0.036 Unadjusted mPFS, months (95% CI) 13.5 (9.9, 25.4) 9.6 (7.8, 11.9) 0.032 PFS HR for treatment adjusted for tumor size, IDH, & MGMT (95%CI) 0.62 (0.39, 0.99) 0.048 SMD, weighted standardized mean difference. † Estimated using CEM weights.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 2009-2009
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

G

Graeme Woodworth

University of Maryland

P

Pavlos Anastasiadis

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

C

Chetan Bettegowda

J

Jeremi Chabros

Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA

C

Chixiang Chen

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

A

Ahmad Ozair

J

Jakob Gerstl

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

C

Chris Douville

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

R

Rania Mekary

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA

T

Timothy Richard Smith

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Y

Ying Meng

Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences

A

Ali Rezai

A

Arjun Sahgal

J

James R. Perry

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

J

Jason Sheehan

D

Dheeraj Gandhi

N

Nathan J. McDannold

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

A

Alexandra J. Golby

Harvard Medical School

N

Nir Lipsman

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada