Multicenter real-world outcomes in limited stage (LS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with abbreviated immunochemotherapy
Abstract
Abstract Background: For LS-DLBCL, clinical trials (FLYER, LYSA/GOELAMS 02-03, LYSA LNH09-1B, S1001) have shown that 4 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP4) without radiation (RT) leads to durable remissions in >90% of cases. However, only patients (pts) with non-bulky disease and/or international prognostic index (IPI) of 0 and complete metabolic response (CMR) on interim positron emission tomography (PET) scan, if performed, were eligible for RCHOP4 alone in these studies. Outcomes in trial-ineligible LS-DLBCL and the appropriate real-world candidates for RCHOP4 are still undefined. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of adult pts with stage I/II DLBCL of any tumor bulk, IPI and with or without B-symptoms diagnosed after 2011 and treated with RCHOP4 +/- 2 cycles R from 21 U.S. centers. Pts with PMBCL, PTLD or receiving non-standard dose RCHOP for cycle (C) 1 or planned consolidative RT were excluded. The primary endpoint was PFS from C1 by Kaplan-Meier method, not counting indolent lymphoma relapse. Event free survival (EFS) was time to next therapy without progression (including unplanned RT for non-CR), progression or death. A competing risks analysis of non-relapse mortality (NRM) vs. DLBCL progression was performed. Results: The characteristics of the 428 pts were: median age 60 (18-88), 60% male, 11% Hispanic and 4% non-Hispanic Black, 62% stage I, 15% elevated LDH, 3% ECOG PS>1, 5% tumor bulk >7cm, 9% had B-symptoms and median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4 (2-12). IPI was 0, 1 and 2-3 in 42%, 46% and 12% and stage-modified IPI (smIPI) was 0, 1, 2 and 3-4 in 25%, 48%, 21% and 6% of pts. 66% had nodal (59% head/neck, 11% pelvic, 9% multiple above diaphragm, 7% abdominal) and 46% extranodal sites (37% head/neck, 20% gastric/intestinal, 9% spleen, 8% skin/soft tissue); 6% had transformed/concurrent FL/MZL or grade 3B FL, 33% (138/408) were non-GCB cell of origin (COO), 25% (90/357) double expressor (DEL) and 0.5% (2/379) double-hit. 13% had completely resected disease, 97% staging PET and 47% bone marrow biopsy. Median diagnosis to treatment interval was 30 days (IQR 20-43), 6% had dose reductions after C1, 77% had an interim PET (iPET) after C2 (33%) or C3 (67%), 15% received 2 additional cycles R and 4% CNS prophylaxis. CMR rates by iPET were 83% after C2 and 94% after C3, and 95% by end-of-treatment PET. iPET PMR was more likely if smIPI>2 or bulky disease. Median follow-up time was 2.7 years. There were 32 progression events: 14 occurred at the primary site and 17 at distant sites (1 unknown), and 12 occurred after 2 years. Another 11 pts received unplanned RT after RCHOP4 for non-CR. There were 24 deaths, 12 without prior progression. Cause of death was DLBCL in 7 and non-DLBCL in 17 cases (6 infection, 2 ILD, 2 heart failure, 2 second cancer, 1 seizure, 4 unknown). EFS, PFS and OS rates were 88%, 90% and 96% at 3 years. By univariable Cox regression, Black race, elevated LDH, smIPI>2, DEL, increasing CCI, multiple subdiaphragmatic nodal sites and iPET PMR were associated with worse PFS. Non-significant variables of note included COO, extranodal sites, complete resection, missing bone marrow biopsy, missing iPET and additional cycles R. By multivariable analysis (including age>60, stage, ECOG PS>1, elevated LDH, bulky disease, CCI, B-symptoms and DEL), ECOG PS>1 (HR 3.95 p=0.050), CCI (HR 1.29 p=0.003) and DEL (HR 2.02 p=0.069) were associated with worse PFS. Cumulative incidence of DLBCL progression and NRM were 8% and 2% at 3 years. Competing risk analysis by univariable models found that age>60, ECOG PS>1, smIPI>2, elevated LDH, CCI and bulky disease were associated with NRM, while DEL and B-symptoms were associated with DLBCL progression.Conclusion: Presented is the largest retrospective cohort of LS-DLBCL treated uniformly with RCHOP4 to date. Despite modest follow-up time and lack of an “intention-to-treat“ population, this study shows that abbreviated RCHOP4 leads to excellent outcomes in the real-world, albeit with continuous risk of late relapse. smIPI risk factors were associated with worse PFS, though this may in part be driven by risk of non-lymphoma death. As pts with advanced age, poor performance status or comorbidities may benefit from reduced treatment exposure, RCHOP4 should still be considered for these and other “trial-ineligible” pts, particularly if other high-risk features (iPET PMR, DEL or B-symptoms) are absent.
Article Details
Authors (45)
Hua-Jay Cherng
16Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States
Drew Gerber
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Hematology & Oncology, New York, United States
Chijioke Nze
6MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Shahzeem Bhayani
3Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, United States
David Russler-Germain
2Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
Ahmed Alnughmush
4Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, United States
Paul Hampel
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Kelsey Kille
5University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States
Danielle Wallace
BIDMC, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
David Qualls
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Reid Merryman
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Jaden Brooks
7University of Utah, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Salt Lake City, United States
Allison Bock
4Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
Juan Ramirez
Yumeng Zhang
Massachusetts Institute of Technology , , , ,
Julio Chavez
1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Katelynn Granger
9Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, United States
Katherine Antel
9Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, United States
Cassandra Duarte
1University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
Ajay Major
Sirui Ma
11University of California San Francisco, Hematology, Blood & Marrow Transplant, and Cellular Therapy, San Francisco, United States
Michael Spinner
11University of California San Francisco, Hematology, Blood & Marrow Transplant, and Cellular Therapy, San Francisco, United States
Alyssa Mackay
12Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Charlotte, United States
Bei Hu
Manoj Rai
13Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, United States
Stephen Spurgeon
1Oregon Health & Sciences University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, United States
Benjamin Lee
Jean Doh
14University of Califorina Irvine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Orange, United States
Elizabeth Brem
14University of Califorina Irvine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Orange, United States
Nicole Altomare
2Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medicine, Chicago, United States
Reem Karmali
2Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medicine, Chicago, United States
Robert Ryan
16Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Division of Hematology, New Brunswick, United States
Yun Kyoung Tiger
6Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States
Jordan Carter
Daniel Landsburg
12University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States
Swetha Thiruvengadam
3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States
Alan Skarbnik
19Novant Health Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology, Charlotte, United States
Yun Choi
Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
David Bond
1The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Ravand Samaeekia
14University of Califorina Irvine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Orange, United States
Helen Ma
43University of California, Irvine, VA Long Beach Health System, Long Beach, United States
Seda Tolu
8Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
Jennifer Amengual
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States
Alex Herrera
3Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, United States
Barbara Pro