Multi-center real world analysis of treatment outcomes of non-COVALENT btki, pirtobrutinib, in patients with COVALENT btki relapsed/refracdtory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: cBTKi have made a substantial impact in pts w/ MCL, but pts who develop PD while on treatment w/ cBTKi have historically had poor responses to subsequent lines of therapy (LOT). Brexucel, lisocel, and the non-covalent BTKi pirto have been approved in this population. While two RW studies have substantiated the benefit of brexucel, similar data for pirto are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pts treated w/ pirto in the RW setting. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult pts w/ a diagnosis of MCL who experienced PD after any approved cBTKi and subsequently received pirto. Pts who received pirto w/ bridging intent and those who switched to pirto due to intolerance of cBTKi were excluded. The 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from pirto start to PD or death, whichever occurred first, and the time from pirto start to death, respectively, and calculated w/ the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. A multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazard model was built to calculate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). Analyses were performed w/ SAS, version 9.4. Results: Data on 111 pts w/ MCL treated across 21 institutions were collected. Median (mdn) age was 72 (range 33 – 93) years. Twenty-seven pts (24%) were female, 3 (3%) were Asian, 5 (5%) Black, 9 (8%) Hispanic, 86 (77%) White. Among the 53 (48%) pts w/ available MIPI-c at diagnosis, 28 (53%) pts were high-risk. Ki67 at diagnosis was available in 84 (76%) pts: of those, 58 (69%) had a Ki67 ≥30%, and 41 (49%) ≥50%. TP53 mutational status was available in 70 (63%) pts: 33 (47%) had documented TP53 mutation and 10/52 (19%) pts had a disease w/ complex karyotype. Pts had a mdn of 3 (range 1 – 9) prior LOT (n=106). Ninety-one pts (86%) received chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), 16 (15%) autologous stem cell transplant, 19 (18%) venetoclax (ven), 29 (27%) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, 4 (4%) allogeneic stem cell transplant. For cBTKi, 39 (35%) pts received ibrutinib, 56 (50%) pts acalabrutinib, 33 (30%) pts zanubrutinib, and 17 (15%) pts received more than one cBTKi. The mdn time from the last dose of cBTKi to pirto start was 55 (range 0 – 2587) days, w/ 51 (46%) pts who switched from a cBTKi directly to pirto. Thirty (27%) pts had no response (stable disease or PD as best response) to cBTKi, and 40 (36%) pts had no response to the last LOT. Two (2%) pts received pirto in combination w/ CIT, 8 (7%) w/ an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), 11 (10%) w/ ven ± a mAb, while 86 (77%) pts as single agent. In 104 (94%) pts, pirto was given at full dose, 10 (9%) pts had a subsequent dose reduction. A total of 35 serious (grade ≥3) adverse events (AE) were documented in 27 (24%) pts: 4 (4%) pts had a serious bleeding AE, 5 (5%) pts a serious cardiac AE, 10 (9%) a serious GI AE, and 16 (14%) a serious infectious AE. Ninety-eight (88%) pts were evaluable for response. The ORR was 40% (95% CI 30% – 50%) w/ a CRR of 29% (95% CI 20%– 39%). At the last follow-up, 29 (26%) pts remained on pirto w/ a mdn treatment duration of 15.1 months (range 0.4 – 26). Fifty-eight (52%) pts died, 35 (78%) because of PD. At a mdn follow-up of 15.8 (range 0.4 – 26) months among survivors, the mdn PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.3 – 8.2) and the mdn OS was 13 months (95% CI 9.2 – not available). Using the log-rank test, age (quartile groups), number of LOT (1-2 vs. 3-4 vs. 5+), time from cBTKi to pirto (quartile groups), Ki67≥30%, and high MIPI-C did not result in a statistically significant difference in PFS (p>0.05). Presence of TP53 mutation was associated w/ a non-statistically significant adverse trend in PFS (p=0.0585). No response to cBTKi and Ki67≥50% were associated w/ a statistically significant inferior PFS in log-rank test (p=<0.05), which persisted in a MV Cox regression model (aHR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2, and aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.4, respectively). Conclusions: This is the first RW report on pirto in MCL pts. In this high-risk population, ORR to pirto was comparable to the BRUIN trial, while PFS was significantly worse, especially in pts w/ no response to cBTKi and w/ a high Ki67. However, prolonged remissions were seen in a subset of pts, suggesting that a better characterization of this population w/ durable benefit from pirto is needed.
Article Details
Authors (43)
Paolo Lopedote
Adrienne Nedved
2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Lu Chen
Marcus Watkins
7Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
Arian Roua
5Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, United States
Muhamad Alhaj Moustafa
2Mayo Clinic Florida, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Jacksonville, United States
Seyi Abidoye
6Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, United States
Yun Choi
Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
Georgios Pongas
9University of Miami, Miami, United States
Tony Zhuang
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, United States
Jean Clement
10University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
Megan Searssmith
11Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States
Laura Sun
12Emory University, Atlanta, United States
Hannah Willis
1University of Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
Brad Kahl
8Washington University, Division of Oncology, St. Louis, United States
David Bond
1The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Javier Muñoz
Izidore S. Lossos
29Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
Craig Portell
1University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
Michael Wang
Nilanjan Ghosh
5Levine Cancer Institute/Advocate Health, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC
Jonathon Cohen
15Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta CA
Peter Martin
Jeremy Abramson
5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology Division, Boston, United States
Anne Beaven
15University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, United States
Patrick Reagan
5University of Rochester, Rochester, United States
Daniel Ermann
2University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States
Taylor Brooks
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Ashlee Joseph
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Division, New York, United States
Nazila Shafagati
1Johns Hopkins, baltimore, United States
Daniel McLoughlin
4University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States
Kira Rosenlind
22Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
Brian Hill
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Nina Wagner-Johnston
9The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
Anita Kumar
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Umar Farooq
Reem Karmali
2Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medicine, Chicago, United States
Tanaya Shree
Matthew Lunning
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center and Nebraska Medicine, Omaha
Stacy Pak
2City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, United States
Alexey Danilov
20City of Hope, Duarte, CA
Yucai Wang
State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine
Tycel Phillips
1City of Hope, Duarte, United States