Multi-center prospective study evaluating an AI-enabled clinical decision support tool to improve biomarker testing in early-stage NSCLC.
Abstract
8044 Background: Non-adherence to guideline-concordant biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can limit access to targeted therapies and adversely impact survival. We evaluated an AI-enabled clinical decision support (AI-CDSS) program comprising: (1) education around baseline testing rates; (2) continuous monitoring to generate real-time alerts for eligible patients with missing biomarker testing; and (3) longitudinal feedback via dashboards. Here, we report the effectiveness of this program in identifying and closing biomarker testing gaps for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Methods: In this descriptive study, we analyzed patients with confirmed NSCLC across 6 geographically and socioeconomically diverse US community health systems. The AI-CDSS identified early-stage patients eligible for biomarker testing (eNSCLC as AJCC 8th edition Stg IB-IIIB (T3, N2) with planned curative intent treatment). Biomarker testing included EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1. We compared testing adherence between a baseline period (BL: 24 months through 3 months prior to the health system-specific roll-out) and a post-launch period (PL: roll-out through Oct 2025). The AI-CDSS was implemented on a rolling basis across health systems (BL from Feb 2022 - Dec 2024 and PL from Feb 2024 - Oct 2025). Testing rates were calculated as the proportion (%) of patients with testing completed within 90 days of pathologic diagnosis in each period. The improvement in test rates (absolute lift) is calculated as the difference in PL - BL testing percentages in the two periods. Results: A total of 662 patients with eNSCLC (270 BL and 392 PL) were included in the analysis. Patients were predominately white (85%), had a history of smoking (88%), with a median age of 70 years at diagnosis. The stage distribution was as follows: Stage III (34%), Stage II (37%), Stage IB (25%), and Stage IB or IIA [indeterminate] (5%). The absolute lift in biomarker testing within 90 days of pathologic diagnosis before vs after intervention was 18% for EGFR, 24% for ALK, and 13% for PDL1 biomarkers. Among patients with molecular testing who received adjuvant treatment, 89% were on guideline-concordant adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Implementation of an AI-CDSS was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in rates of biomarker testing for eNSCLC and resulted in high concordance with guideline-directed adjuvant therapy. Appropriate and timely biomarker testing is essential for perioperative treatment planning. This study provides preliminary evidence that AI can use complex electronic health records to provide real-time interventions that can promote guideline-concordant care. Testing gap results. Biomarker Baseline N Baseline Test Rate Post Launch N Post Launch Test Rate Absolute Lift EGFR 264 49% 392 67% 18% ALK 270 43% 389 67% 24% PD-L1 270 59% 389 72% 13%
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Melina Elpi Marmarelis
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Jessica Dow
Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL
Journey Penney
Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL
Binyam Yilma
2Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, United States
Alexis Aiello
Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL
Marina Codari
Tempus AI, Chicago, IL
Chithra Sangli
Tempus AI, Chicago, IL
Karen Huelsman
TriHealth Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH
Andrew J. Parchman
Trihealth Cancer and Blood Institute, Cincinnati, OH
Charu Aggarwal
Sarah Grace Thompson
YUMA Regional Cancer Center, Yuma, AZ
Natraj Reddy Ammakkanavar
George R. Simon
Amol Rao
MemorialCare Cancer Institute, Fountain Valley, CA
Gautum Agarwal
Urologic Oncology and Precision Medicine, Mercy Oncology and Hematology—David C. Pratt Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO
Ezra E.W. Cohen
Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL
Jyoti D. Patel
Tempus AI, Chicago, IL
Noah Zimmerman
Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL