MSK-impact heme accurately reproduces diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) dlbclass cluster classification across clinical scenarios, including diagnosis, relapse, and histological transformation

A Aaron Gillmor (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Oncology, New York, United States) A Alfredo Rivas-Delgado (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) M Manik Uppal (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) M Michelle Okwali (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) M Menglei Zhu (3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) A Alexander Boardman (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) K Kevin David (1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States) Z Zachary Epstein-Peterson (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) M Mark Ewalt (5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States) L Lorenzo Falchi (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) P Pallavi Kanwar Galera (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) P Paola Ghione (4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) P Paul Hamlin (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) S Steven Horwitz (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) W William Johnson (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Anita Kumar (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) J Jennifer Lue (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) E Efrat Luttwak (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) L Lia Palomba (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) R Raphael Steiner R Robert Stuver (3Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) P Pallawi Torka (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Andrew Zelenetz (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Allison Richards (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Oncology, New York, United States) R Roni Shouval (1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Ahmet Dogan (Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) M Maria Arcila (4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Diagnostic Service, Department of Pathology, New York, United States) G Gilles Salles (41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Molecular classifications of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can identify patient groups that benefit from distinct, innovative therapies. However, their implementation in routine practice has yet to be demonstrated. DLBclass (Chapuy, 2025) is a probabilistic, neural network–based classifier that assigns DLBCL cases to one of five genetic clusters (C1–C5). MSK-IMPACT Heme is a clinical NGS panel for detecting somatic mutations and allele-specific copy number alterations (CNAs) (Ptashkin, 2023). Here, we demonstrate how MSK-IMPACT Heme data collected during routine clinical care across various disease states enable the classification of cases into DLBclass clusters. Methods: DLBCL samples underwent MSK-IMPACT Heme sequencing along with clinical evaluation. This enabled the generation of DLBclass inputs: CNAs were called with FACETS, mutations annotated per Ptashkin (2023), structural variants identified by FISH, and cell-of-origin classified using the Hans algorithm. Technical validation: A total of 531 unique samples were initially assessed: 139 were excluded for low tumor purity (<20%) or failed FACETS quality control, resulting in a final cohort of 392 samples. This included 279 de novo DLBCL cases (184 pre- & 95 post-treatment) and 113 transformed indolent NHL (tiNHL) cases. Gene coverage of DLBclass cluster assignments ranged from 52% to 98% across the MSK-IMPACT Heme panels. Among the pre-treatment de novo DLBCL samples, cases were distributed across clusters as follows: 11% in C1, 28% in C2, 31% in C3, 12% in C4, and 17% in C5. Cluster C3 was significantly enriched compared to the published reference DLBclass datasets (p < 0.001), while the distribution of the other clusters mirrored that of the reference cohort. Using a 0.7 confidence threshold, we observed a lower proportion of high-confidence predictions in clusters C1, C4, and C5 relative to the DLBclass data. Across 45 matched samples with both WES and MSK-IMPACT Heme sequencing, cluster assignments were consistent in 71% of cases. Among the 13 mismatches, 12 involved cluster C2, highlighting variability in CNA-driven clusters between platforms. Given that C2 is primarily defined by CNAs, we investigated the impact of CNA removal on cluster assignment. Excluding CNAs led to a reduction in C2-classified samples, from 33% to 3.6%. Notably, in post-treatment samples, C2 had comprised 42%, underscoring its relevance in that clinical context. Upon CNA removal, many C2 samples shifted toward C3, suggesting that in the absence of CNAs, mutation profiles and panel breadth play a dominant role in cluster classification. Applying the DLBclass framework to routine MSK-IMPACT Heme data reproduced cluster patterns seen in reference datasets, validating its use in clinical samples and supporting further study of cluster biology and phenotypes. Biological and clinical correlations: In the de novo DLBCL cohort, the C3 cluster was significantly enriched for germinal center B-cell (GCB)–type cases, while C5 was more frequent among non-GCB cases (p < 0.001), both consistent with Chapuy (2025). Additionally, C3 and C5 showed enrichment for double/triple-hit lymphomas and primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL), respectively. Cluster C2 was associated with low tumor mutational burden (TMB), whereas C4 correlated with high TMB. Patterns of progression-free survival mirrored those reported in the original DLBclass cohort, suggesting consistent clinical behavior across datasets. Among 15 patients with sequential samples, 80% retained stable cluster assignments over time. Changes in cluster confidence were mostly observed within C2, indicating overall low genomic heterogeneity across serial samples. Applying the DLBclass classifier to samples obtained after histologic transformation, we found that C3 was enriched in patients with prior follicular lymphoma, C2 in those with transformed chronic lymphocytic leukemia and marginal zone lymphoma (p < 0.001). MZL samples also showed enrichment in C5 (p < 0.003). Conclusion: Our findings are the first to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of applying the DLBclass genomic classifier to routine clinical samples using the MSK-IMPACT Heme assay. In our cohort, the classifier reproduced cluster distributions similar to reference datasets, establishing a basis for incorporating genomic subtyping into clinical workflows and improving molecular classification to guide personalized therapeutic strategies in DLBCL.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1766-1766
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (28)

A

Aaron Gillmor

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Oncology, New York, United States

A

Alfredo Rivas-Delgado

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

M

Manik Uppal

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

M

Michelle Okwali

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

M

Menglei Zhu

3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

A

Alexander Boardman

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

K

Kevin David

1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States

Z

Zachary Epstein-Peterson

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

M

Mark Ewalt

5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States

L

Lorenzo Falchi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

P

Pallavi Kanwar Galera

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

P

Paola Ghione

4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

P

Paul Hamlin

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

S

Steven Horwitz

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

W

William Johnson

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Anita Kumar

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

J

Jennifer Lue

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

E

Efrat Luttwak

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

L

Lia Palomba

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

R

Raphael Steiner

R

Robert Stuver

3Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

P

Pallawi Torka

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Andrew Zelenetz

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Allison Richards

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Oncology, New York, United States

R

Roni Shouval

1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Ahmet Dogan

Hematopathology Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

M

Maria Arcila

4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Diagnostic Service, Department of Pathology, New York, United States

G

Gilles Salles

41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY