MRD negativity after end of induction in the phase 3 PhALLCON trial: A post hoc analysis.
Abstract
6510 Background: The phase 3 PhALLCON trial (NCT03589326) in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL met its primary endpoint, showing a significantly higher rate of minimal residual disease negativity (MRDneg; BCR::ABL1 IS ≤0.01%) with complete remission (CR) at end of induction (EOI) with ponatinib (PON) vs imatinib (IMA; 34.4% vs 16.7%; P =0.002) and safety comparable to IMA. We report post hoc analyses of patients (pts) who did not reach MRDneg by EOI. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to PON (30 mg QD reduced to 15 mg upon MRDneg CR at EOI) or IMA (600 mg QD) plus 20 cycles (C) of reduced-intensity chemotherapy (induction C1–3; consolidation C4–9; maintenance combination C10–20) then PON/IMA monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cumulative molecular response rates, event-free survival (EFS; defined as any-cause death, no CR by EOI, or relapse from CR), and safety were evaluated in pts with BCR::ABL1 p190/p210 confirmed by central lab at baseline who did not reach MRDneg by EOI and those achieving MRDneg post-cycle 4 day 1 (C4D1). Data cutoff: Aug 12, 2022. Results: Of 232 pts (PON/IMA: n=154/78) with p190/p210, 140 (86 [56%]/54 [69%]) did not have MRDneg by EOI (median age: 54 y; ≥60 y: 37%; female: 55%; ECOG 0/1: 44%/49%; p190/p210: 66%/34%). Of these, 113 pts (PON/IMA: 73/40) continued treatment after EOI, 48 of whom (35 [48%]/13 [33%]) reached MRDneg (MR4 or better) post-C4D1 (Table). Of those 48 pts (median age: 54 y; ≥60 y: 33%; female: 60%; ECOG 0/1: 46%/54%; p190/p210: 71%/29%), median duration of MRDneg (95% CI) was not reached (NR; 13.0 mo–NR) with PON and 3.8 mo (2.3–NR) with IMA; 16 pts (PON/IMA: 10/6) had HSCT. In the 140 pts without MRDneg by EOI, median EFS (mEFS; 95% CI) was NR (NR–NR) with PON and 24.8 mo (21.3–NR) with IMA; 2-y EFS (95% CI) was 82% (69–90) and 62% (41–77), respectively. In the 48 pts with MRDneg post-C4D1, mEFS was NR (NR–NR) and NR (21.3 mo–NR); 2-y EFS was 88% (68–96) and 80% (20–97), respectively. In the 140 pts without MRDneg by EOI, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates with PON/IMA were 100%/98% (gr ≥3: 91%/94%); dose modification due to TEAEs: 71%/54% (discontinuation: 15%/9%; reduction: 16%/28%; interruption: 66%/41%). In the 48 pts with MRDneg post-C4D1, TEAE rates with PON/IMA were 100%/100% (gr ≥3: 91%/100%); dose modification due to TEAEs: 69%/62% (discontinuation: 6%/0%; reduction: 11%/46%; interruption: 69%/38%). Conclusions: Among pts without MRDneg by EOI, more pts who continued the study achieved deep and durable molecular response after C4D1, and 2-y EFS appeared to be better with PON than IMA. These data support the clinical benefit and tolerability of continuing PON in pts without MRDneg by EOI. Clinical trial information: NCT03589326 . Response in pts without MRDneg by EOI who continued treatment post-C4D1, n (%) PON (n=73) IMA (n=40) MRDneg 35 (48) 13 (33) By end of C9 28 (38) 11 (28) By end of C20 30 (41) 12 (30) MR4.5 ( BCR :: ABL1 IS ≤0.0032%) 27 (37) 4 (10) By end of C9 17 (23) 2 (5) By end of C20 23 (32) 3 (8)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Ibrahim Aldoss
Pankit Vachhani
25University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, United States
Hagop M. Kantarjian
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Pau Montesinos
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Jessica Taft Leonard
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
David Gomez-Almaguer
1Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez, Hematologia, monterrey, Mexico
Maria R. Baer
10University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
James K. McCloskey
John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
Yosuke Minami
1National Cancer Center East, Hematology, Kashiwa, Japan
Cristina Papayannidis
2IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
Vanderson Geraldo Rocha
Philippe Rousselot
Eunice S. Wang
30Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
Lin Yang
Meliessa Hennessy
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Alexander Vorog
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Niti Patel
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA
Jose-Maria Ribera-Santasusana
ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Elias Jabbour
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA