MRD-guided therapy of sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + obinutuzumab (O) in patients with treatment-naive CLL: Initial results from an ongoing phase 1/1b study, BGB-11417-101

M Marc Hoffmann S Shuo Ma H Herbert Eradat (27Department of Hematology and Oncology, Santa Monica Cancer Care, Santa Monica, CA) C Constantine Tam (1Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) M Masa Lasica (4St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia) P Paul Hampel (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) E Emma Verner (5Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia) L Lori Leslie (14Division of Oncology, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ) C Christopher D'Angelo (1University of Nebraska Medical Center, OMAHA, United States) J Jacob Soumerai (12Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States) M Mazyar Shadman C Chan Cheah (20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia) M Monica Tani (14Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, “Santa Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, Italy) Y Yiqian Fang (19BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China) B Binghao Wu (14BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China) G Gabriel Man (15BeOne Medicines Ltd, San Carlos, United States) S Sheel Patel R Remus Vezan (18BeOne Medicines Ltd, San Carlos, United States) S Stephen Opat (7Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The first-generation BCL2 inhibitor,venetoclax, is an effective treatment for CLL/SLL, but its usage may be limited by toxicity. Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, is a more selective and pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL2 than venetoclax, with a shorter half-life and no drug accumulation. BGB-11417-101 (NCT04277637) is an ongoing, phase 1/1b, dose-escalation/expansion study in patients with B-cell malignancies. Presented here are preliminary data for sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL/SLL in BGB-11417-101. Methods: Obinutuzumab is administered intravenously at 100 mg on day (D) 1, 900 mg on D2, 1,000 mg on D8 and D15 of cycle (C) 1, and then 1,000 mg on D1 of C2-6 of each 28-day cycle. Beginning on C2D1, sonrotoclax is administered orally once daily with ramp-up to the target doses, 160 or 320 mg. Patients can continue treatment until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD4; <1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes [<0.01%]) in peripheral blood (PB) by next-generation sequencing (NGS; ClonoSEQ) after 15 treatment cycles. Study endpoints include safety per NCI-CTCAE v5.0, overall response rate (ORR) per iwCLL guidelines, and MRD status in PB per modified ERIC flow cytometry (FC) assay or NGS, depending on the timepoint. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is assessed per Howard (2011) criteria. Results: As of May 16, 2025, 55 patients with TN CLL/SLL were enrolled (160 mg, n=20; 320 mg, n=35), and 21 patients (all 320 mg) have discontinued sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab (due to uMRD4 per NGS as protocol-mandated [n=17], PI decision uMRD4 per FC [n=2], and PD [n=2]). Four patients discontinued obinutuzumab only per PI decision (160 mg, n=1), thrombocytopenia (320 mg, n=2), and prostate cancer prior to starting sonrotoclax (160 mg, n=1). For all patients, the median age was 62 y, 65% were male, and 89% were White. At baseline, 14% of patients (8/55) had high tumor burden and 58% (31/53) had unmutated IGHV. Median study follow-up was 8.9 months (range, 0.4-25.4 months) for all patients; 6.4 months (range, 0.4-9.0 months) for 160 mg; and 16.0 months (range, 2.9-25.4 months) for 320 mg. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (56%), infusion-related reaction (56%), and neutropenia (49%). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 TEAE (38%). No deaths due to TEAEs occurred, and no TEAEs led to sonrotoclax discontinuation. Two cases of laboratory TLS occurred after C1D1 of obinutuzumab prior to starting sonrotoclax; no clinical or laboratory TLS occurred during sonrotoclax ramp up. No meaningful safety differences were observed among sonrotoclax dose cohorts. In 37 efficacy-evaluable patients (160 mg, n=7; 320 mg, n=30), the ORR was 89%; for the 320-mg cohort, ORR was 93% (28/30). Complete response (CR) rates (CR + CR with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi]) were 46% (all patients) and 43% (320 mg). For 23 patients in the 320 mg cohort who reached the C15 MRD assessment, the best C15 uMRD4 rate per FC was 87% (20/23; 2 not evaluable; 1 missing); per NGS, the uMRD4 rate at C15 was 78% (18/23; 5 missing). All patients with an available C15 MRD assessment achieved uMRD4 and remain in remission as of the data cutoff date. The median time from reaching sonrotoclax target dose to uMRD4 was 2.3 months (range, 1.4-5.6 months) in the 320-mg cohort. Three patients experienced PFS events: 1 died from an indeterminate cause (160 mg, discontinued treatment after C1D9 of obinutuzumab) and 2 had PD (320 mg; both Richter's transformation at C6 and C2). Conclusions: Sonrotoclax + obinutuzumab was generally well tolerated in patients with TN CLL/SLL, with no sonrotoclax discontinuations or deaths due to TEAEs. No laboratory or clinical TLS events occurred during sonrotoclax ramp-up. Encouraging antitumor activity was observed with sonrotoclax 320 mg. High rates of blood uMRD4 occurred early and deepened over time. All patients with an available C15 MRD assessment by NGS or FC achieved uMRD4 and remain in remission. A registrational phase 3 study (CELESTIAL-RRCLL, BGB-11417-303) assessing this combination with sonrotoclax 320 mg is currently recruiting.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 793-793
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (19)

M

Marc Hoffmann

S

Shuo Ma

H

Herbert Eradat

27Department of Hematology and Oncology, Santa Monica Cancer Care, Santa Monica, CA

C

Constantine Tam

1Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

M

Masa Lasica

4St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

P

Paul Hampel

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

E

Emma Verner

5Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia

L

Lori Leslie

14Division of Oncology, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ

C

Christopher D'Angelo

1University of Nebraska Medical Center, OMAHA, United States

J

Jacob Soumerai

12Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

M

Mazyar Shadman

C

Chan Cheah

20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia

M

Monica Tani

14Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, “Santa Maria delle Croci” Hospital, Ravenna, Italy

Y

Yiqian Fang

19BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China

B

Binghao Wu

14BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China

G

Gabriel Man

15BeOne Medicines Ltd, San Carlos, United States

S

Sheel Patel

R

Remus Vezan

18BeOne Medicines Ltd, San Carlos, United States

S

Stephen Opat

7Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia