Monocytosis as prognostic factor for chronic graft versus host disease

C Cristina Marrero-Cepeda (1University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), CSIC, University of Seville, Spain, Department of Hematology, Seville, Spain) T Teresa Caballero-Velazquez (22Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC), Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain) F Francisco Manuel Martin-Dominguez (1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain) N Nancy Rodriguez-Torres (1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain) C Cristina Blazquez Go I (1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain) M Maria Carmen Martinez Munoz (1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) M Maria Queralt Salas Gay (1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) M Maria Suarez-Lledo (1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) F Francesc Fernández-Avilés (1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) M Montserrat Rovira (1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) C Carlos Solano (11Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia /Spain, Valencia, Spain) A Ariadna Perez-Martinez (3Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain) J Jose Piñana (4Hematology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario-INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain) A Ana Belén Bocanegra (4Hospital Puerta del Hierro, Spain, Madrid, Spain) J Joud Zanabili (5Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain, Oviedo, Spain) M Maite Zudaire (6Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Spain, Pamplona, Spain) J José Antonio Pérez-Simón

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is the main cause of long-term morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although some biomarkers have been identified for acute GvHD (aGvHD), no reliable markers are available for cGvHD. A prognostic biomarker for cGvHD would enable tailored prophylaxis, optimized immunosuppression, and monitoring. However, most biomarkers described—alloantibodies, microRNAs, extracellular vesicles, or immune cell subsets—have limitations regarding feasibility in routine settings. Monocytes play a key role in cGvHD pathogenesis via antigen presentation, cytokine release (e.g., IL-1, TNF-α), and downstream immune activation leading to tissue damage. Elevated and activated monocyte levels have been documented in cGvHD and therapies such as CSF-1R inhibition with axatilimab have shown benefit in refractory cases. In this context, absolute monocyte count may serve as a simple and cost-effective biomarker. We previously suggested this hypothesis in a single-center study; here, we validate this finding in a multicenter study. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including patients who underwent allo-HSCT in 8 Spanish centers between 2014–2017. Those who died within the first 100 days post-transplant were excluded. A total of 477 patients were analyzed. Monocytosis was defined as a monocyte count > 1 × 10⁹/L, occurring during post-transplant follow-up any time prior to the onset of cGvHD or 6 months before cGvHD onset. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 50 years (IQR 25–75: 40–58 years), with a mean age of 47.5 years (SD = 13.2). Regarding sex, 59.0% of the patients were male. Most patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen (67.4%). The donor type was predominantly matched related (sibling) in 34.8% of cases, followed by matched unrelated donors in 32.5%. Male donors accounted for 64.5% of cases. The primary source of hematopoietic stem cells was peripheral blood (92.4%). Regarding disease status at the time of transplantation, 57.9% of patients were in complete remission (CR), 17.3% were in partial remission, and 14.6% had active disease. Overall mortality was 36.3%, and the relapse rate was 30.6% at 8 years. A highly significant association was observed between the presence of prior monocytosis and the development of cGvHD (p < 0.001). Among patients who developed cGvHD, 44.8% had prior monocytosis, compared to only 1.3% of those who did not. The risk of cGvHD at 36 months was 93.6% (range: 87-96.9%) vs 41% (range: 35.3-46.2%) for patients with or without monocytosis [HR 3.29 (95% CI 2.55-4.24), p < 0.001]. Chronic GvHD flared at a median of 10 months in patients with monocytosis and it was not reached during follow-up in patients with lower counts (p < 0.0001). In addition, monocyte count proved to be a strong prognostic factor not only for the incidence but also for the severity of cGvHD. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe cGvHD was 83.6% (range 71.4–90.6%) in patients with monocytosis at any time post-transplant and prior to cGvHD onset, compared to 29.3% (23.9–34.3%) in those without [HR 3.39 (95% CI 2.50-4.59), p < 0.001]. For severe cGvHD, the respective incidences were 47.2% (range 30.7–59.7%) and 14.3% (range 9.9–18.4%) [HR 2.93 (95% CI 1.84-4.65), p < 0.001]. Upon considering monocytosis occurring within 6 months prior to the onset of cGvHD these values were: HR 4.13 (95% CI 2.86-5.97), p < 0.001 for moderate to severe and HR 4.26 (95% CI 2.46-7.37), p < 0.001 for severe cGvHD. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.4%, therefore, most patients with monocytosis developed cGvHD. Again, considering monocytosis occurring within 6 months prior to the onset of cGvHD PPV was also 97.4%. Finally, we performed a multivariate analysis for overall cGvHD including monocytes count, GvHD prophylaxis, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning regimens and prior aGvHD. Patients with monocytosis during follow-up had 2.51 times higher risk of developing cGvHD than those without it (HR 2.51, IC 95%: 1.92–3.29; p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, monocytosis onset following allo-HSCT is a prognostic biomarker of cGvHD. Monocytes' count ≥ 1.0 109/ L may help to identify patients at a higher risk of cGvHD, particularly those with moderate and severe forms.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 7760-7760
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

C

Cristina Marrero-Cepeda

1University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), CSIC, University of Seville, Spain, Department of Hematology, Seville, Spain

T

Teresa Caballero-Velazquez

22Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC), Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

F

Francisco Manuel Martin-Dominguez

1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain

N

Nancy Rodriguez-Torres

1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain

C

Cristina Blazquez Go I

1Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematología y Hemoterapia, Seville, Spain

M

Maria Carmen Martinez Munoz

1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

M

Maria Queralt Salas Gay

1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

M

Maria Suarez-Lledo

1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

F

Francesc Fernández-Avilés

1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

M

Montserrat Rovira

1Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

C

Carlos Solano

11Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia /Spain, Valencia, Spain

A

Ariadna Perez-Martinez

3Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain

J

Jose Piñana

4Hematology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario-INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain

A

Ana Belén Bocanegra

4Hospital Puerta del Hierro, Spain, Madrid, Spain

J

Joud Zanabili

5Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain, Oviedo, Spain

M

Maite Zudaire

6Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Spain, Pamplona, Spain

J

José Antonio Pérez-Simón