Molecular characterization of residual disease post-neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan (SG), pembrolizumab, or their combination in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Abstract
4617 Background: In patients (pts) with MIBC, we tested the activity of neoadjuvant SG (SURE-01, NCT05226117), SG + pembrolizumab (SURE-02, NCT05535218) and pembrolizumab alone (PURE-01, NCT02736266), followed by surgery. We aimed to molecularly characterize the residual post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) MIBC and its changes from baseline samples. Methods: Post-NAT samples (ypT≥2) were available for transcriptome analyses from 12 pts in SURE-01, 24 in SURE-02, and 26 post-pembrolizumab alone. Decipher bladder genomic subtyping classifier (GSC) expression profiling assay (Veracyte) was used to compare molecular subtyping distributions and genes/signatures expressions between matched pre-post NAT samples, including 192 locked transcriptomic signatures in GRID (v3.1) and pre-specified therapeutic target genes. FGFR3-active tumors were determined using a previously-developed long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-based classifier. The clinical primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: Post-NAT molecular subtyping identified Luminal (L) vs non-Luminal (NL) tumors in: 17% (2/12) vs 83% (10/12) (SURE-01), 21% (5/24) versus 79% (19/24) (SURE-02), and 8% (2/26) versus 92% (24/26) (PURE-01). In total, 21 pts from SURE studies and 22 from PURE-01 had matched pre-post NAT samples. Consensus molecular subtyping revealed a concordance in 86% (6/7) of pts in SURE-01, 57% (8/14) in SURE-02 and 36% (8/22) in PURE-01. Stroma-rich tumors were found in 17% (2/12), 29% (7/24) and 50% (13/26) of post-NAT samples. After NAT, we found a decrease in L subtypes in SURE-01 (57% → 29%) and in SURE-02 (36% → 14%) vs an increase in stroma-rich (Consensus) subtype in SURE-02 (7% → 36%) and in PURE-01 (14% → 50%). Elevation of TGF-beta signaling hallmark (p=0.02) and immune exclusion (p=0.02) scores characterized post-NAT samples in SURE-01, while in SURE-02 we found elevated stromal gene scores (p=0.004) and lower DNA repair hallmark scores (p=0.03) after NAT. Comparing matched samples from SURE-01 and 02, we found significantly decreased TROP2 expression scores (p=0.03) and lower HER2 (p=0.06) and NECTIN4 expression (p=0.07). Application of the lncRNA-based FGFR3-activity classifier revealed a total of 10/36 (28%) FGFR3-active tumors post-NAT in SURE-01 and SURE-02, all without EFS events during follow-up. For SURE-02, we found 4/24 (17%) pts harboring claudin-low tumors post-NAT, who did not experience EFS events following adjuvant pembrolizumab, similar to the low EFS rate observed in PURE-01 (N=7, 22%). Conclusions: This study expands our knowledge on residual MIBC after various NAT, displaying a noteworthy plasticity and significant changes post-NAT that are important to unveil the biology of these tumors and putative biomarkers for sequential therapies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Andrea Necchi
Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy
Joep Jacobus de Jong
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Antonio Cigliola
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
James A. Proudfoot
Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA
Valentina Tateo
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Michela Piacentini
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Gaia Latini
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Giovanni Luigi Pastorino
IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
Emanuele Crupi
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Maurizio Colecchia
Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Giorgio Brembilla
Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Marco Moschini
Elai Davicioni
Alberto Briganti
Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan
Francesco Montorsi
Dipartimento di Chimica industriale “Toso Montanari”, Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 85, Bologna 40129, Italy
Brigida Anna Maiorano
Chiara Mercinelli
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy