Molecular and structural basis of pan-resistance to BTK targeting therapies via BTK A428D mutation
Abstract
Abstract BTK degraders promote proteasomal degradation of BTK and can overcome resistance to covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors in patients with relapsed CLL. Currently the molecular basis for BTK degrader resistance is unknown. We therefore set out to understand BTK degrader resistance based on observations from the phase 1 trial of zelebrudomide (NX-2127) (NCT04830137), the first BTK degrader to enter clinical studies. Targeted 500-gene sequencing was performed on blood and/or tissue from four CLL patients treated with zelebrudomide. In one patient previously treated with chemoimmunotherapy, ibrutinib, venetoclax, and pirtobrutinib, BTK A428D was detected in the baseline blood sample with variant allele frequency (VAF) of <2%, along with BTK V416L (13%) and mutations in TP53 (60%) and SF3B1 (37%). Following daily treatment with 100mg zelebrudomide and subsequent dose escalation to 200mg, at 6 months the VAF of all four mutations increased, with BTK A428D VAF increasing to 6% in the blood and 29% in a lymph node. BTK A428D was detected at baseline but not at progression in a second patient. To evaluate the impact of BTK A428D on drug response, we transduced BTK-dependent TMD8 cells with BTK WT, C481S, L528W, and A428D, and found that BTK A428D uniquely conferred resistance to all FDA-approved BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, pirtobrutinib) as well as three BTK degraders under clinical evaluation (zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673). To model the subclonal nature of BTK A428D we conducted a competition assay in which TMD8 cells expressing GFP + BTK A428D (5%) were mixed with TMD8 cells expressing mCherry + BTK WT (95%); over 9 days the GFP + BTK A428D expanded from 5% to 88-97% with all four BTKi and all three BTK degraders. In vitro kinase assays revealed that the BTK A428D mutant protein lacks kinase activity yet facilitates calcium flux and ERK/AKT signaling upon B-cell receptor activation, suggesting a scaffolding effect similar to other kinase deficient BTK mutations. To determine whether BTK A428D affects BTK degradation, we developed a reporter that fuses the BTK kinase domain to GFP. BTK A428D showed minimal degradation following 20 hours of treatment with a titration of all three BTK degraders. Similarly, we knocked BTK A428D into the endogenous BTK locus of HBL1 cells and confirmed a lack of degradation at doses up to 1 µM of all 3 degraders. Consistent with these findings, surface plasmon resonance revealed that the FDA-approved BTK inhibitors as well as zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673, and AbbVie-1 (Compound 1 from WO 2023183811) are unable to bind to BTK A428D. Additionally, an in-cell NanoBRET assay demonstrated that zelebrudomide was unable to mediate the interaction between cereblon and BTK A428D. Strikingly, NanoBRET also demonstrated that a panel of promiscuous kinase-binding compounds was unable to bind to BTK A428D. The lack of binding of both selective and promiscuous kinase binders to BTK A428D led us to speculate that the mutation disrupted the ATP binding pocket to an unusual degree. We therefore solved the crystal structure of apo BTK A428D and found that, in addition to its predicted steric clash with ligand binding in the hinge region, the mutation led the protein to crystallize with its activation loop occupying the catalytic cleft, rendering it inaccessible. This is the first apo BTK structure observed in this autoinhibited conformation, and explains the observed binding profile. We hypothesized that the addition of a second targeted agent such as venetoclax might mitigate expansion of the A428D subclone. To test this, we introduced the BTK A428D mutation into the endogenous BTK gene in 3% of TMD8 cells and then exposed them to 0.1µM of zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, or BGB-16673 +/- venetoclax 0.1µM. Combining the BTK degraders with venetoclax slowed the emergence of the BTK A428D resistant population and, in the case of zelebrudomide, eradicated both the wild-type and A428D clones. In summary, we identified and validated BTK A428D as a clinically relevant acquired pan-resistance mutation that confers resistance by blocking access to the ATP binding pocket. This mechanism differs from other kinase dead BTK mutations in which the kinase's enzymatic pocket remained accessible.These data also provide rationale for combining BTK degraders with BCL2 inhibitors, particularly in patients with BTK A428D mutations, or high-risk mutations such as in TP53.
Article Details
Authors (27)
Quinlan Sievers
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Hao Lu
State Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Drugs and Large-scale Preparation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Allison Cool
3University of Miami, Miami, United States
Stefan Gajewski
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Tim Kong
Mark Noviski
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Emel Ficici
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Ratul Mukerji
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.
James Iuliano
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Jordan Ye
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los Rios
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Hugo Bousquet
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Sarah Whelan
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
May Tan
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Chris Phelps
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Xiaoli Mi
2Department of Medicine, Cell Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Jahan Rahman
1Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Samantha Sekeres
3University of Miami, Miami, United States
Erica Lamkin
3University of Miami, Miami, United States
Eduardo Bravo
Center for the Advanced Study of Drug Action, Department of Chemistry
Mark Ewalt
5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States
Anthony Mato
2Cayuga Medical Center, Cayuga, United States
Lindsey Roeker
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Justin Taylor
Meghan Thompson
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Gwenn Hansen
2Nurix Therapeutics, San Francisco, United States
Omar Abdel-Wahab
Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute