Mobile species’ responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs and synergies among nature’s contributions to people
Abstract
Agricultural landscapes provide material, nonmaterial, and regulating contributions that affect human well-being (nature’s contributions to people, NCP). The responses of these NCP to land-use patterns depend on supporting biota with different habitat requirements, generating trade-offs and synergies. Predictions from spatially explicit modeling of NCP trade-offs and synergies could inform land-use decisions, but these do not typically account for the effects of land-use patterns on the movement of NCP-providing species, nor for interactions among NCP providers. To explore spatial trade-offs and synergies in eight indicators of NCP, we used Bayesian models that allow for interactions among land uses and among NCP using data from 150 grassland sites across rural Germany. We found that spatial arrangements of forest and open habitat influenced many beneficial NCP: acoustic diversity, birdwatching potential, natural enemy abundance, and pollination. In particular, the amount and proximity of land uses in the surrounding landscape, especially forest and open habitat, drove the supply of most NCP. However, detrimental NCP provided by smaller-bodied taxa (herbivory and pathogen infection) responded weakly to landscape factors. Multiple NCP provided by a given taxon responded differently to their surrounding landscape (e.g., bird-provided beneficial caterpillar predation and detrimental seed predation), leading to trade-offs and synergies among NCP over short distances. These were caused by different rates and directions of response to amount and location of land uses. Resulting spatial predictions revealed that the ratio of beneficial to detrimental NCP was maximized in areas with a high (≥95%) area of grassland or mixed forest-grassland (70:30%), rather than purely forest-dominated areas. This suggests promoting seminatural vegetation in agricultural landscapes to provide greater-than-additive benefits to net NCP supply.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (15)
Sophie A. O’Brien
Food Transitions 2050 Joint Postgraduate School, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury
Jason M. Tylianakis
Bioprotection Aotearoa Centre of Research Excellence, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury
Dean P. Anderson
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research
Andrea Larissa Boesing
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
Hao Ran Lai
Bioprotection Aotearoa Centre of Research Excellence, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury
Gaëtane Le Provost
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
Peter Manning
Centre for Sustainable Area Management, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen
Margot Neyret
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
Nico Blüthgen
Kirsten Jung
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Department of Biology, Ulm University
Paul Magdon
Fakultät Ressourcenmanagement, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst
Sandra Muller
Noëlle V. Schenk
Bern University of Applied Sciences, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Abteilung Studiengangsübergr Disziplinen
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Sandra Lavorel
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research