MMF is associated with higher non-relapse mortality and inferior survival in AML/MDS patients receiving peripheral blood matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide based gvhd prophylaxis

R Rima M. Saliba (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) J Jennifer Miatech (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) J Jeremy Ramdial (3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) G Gabriela Rondon (6The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) G Gheath Alatrash (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) A Amin Alousi (20MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) Q Qaiser Bashir (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) G George Chen (Department of Chemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA) W Warren Fingrut (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) C Chitra Hosing (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) P Partow Kebriaei (MD Anderson Cancer Center) I Issa Khouri (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) D David Marin Y Yago Nieto (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Hematopathology, Houston, United States) A Amanda Olson (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) B Betul Oran (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) U Uday Popat (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) M Muzaffar Qazilbash (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) P Portia Smallbone (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) S Samer Srour (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) M Mark Tanner (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) K Katayoun Rezvani R Richard Champlin (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States) E Elizabeth Shpall R Rohtesh Mehta (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Results of our previous studies have suggested that the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis may not confer clinical benefit and may adversely affect outcomes in certain hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) contexts. In HLA-matched HCT utilizing post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and tacrolimus, MMF was associated with a higher incidence of moderate acute GvHD, delayed immune reconstitution, and increased bacterial infections, with a modest reduction in relapse rates (Mehta et al, Transplant Cell Ther, 2022). These observations prompted further investigation in a larger, single-center cohort, the findings of which are presented below. Methods. AML/MDS patients who underwent their first HLA-matched unrelated (MUD) or related (MRD) HCT with peripheral blood stem cells between 2018-2024 at our institution and received PTCy-based (± MMF) were eligible for this study. The impact of MMF on HCT outcomes was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses, accounting for competing risks as applicable. Results. A total of 846 consecutive patients underwent their first MUD (N=547) or MRD (N=299) HCT during the study period. Median (range) recipient age and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) were 63 (18-78) years and 3 (0-10), respectively, and 52% (N=442) of patients had HCT-CI ≥3. Seventy-two percent (N=612) of patients had AML and 46% (N=390) had high-risk (defined by ELN17 for AML and IPSS-R for MDS) disease. Conditioning was myeloablative in 71% (N=599) of transplants, and MMF was included in the GvHD prophylaxis in 70% (n=595) of transplants. The median (range) follow-up was 30 (2-86) months. At 2 years post-HCT, overall survival (OS) was 62% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 59-66), non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 16% (95% CI: 13-18), and disease progression was 26% (95% CI: 23-29). In multivariate analysis, the use of MMF was associated with significantly inferior OS (53% vs 65%, HR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-2.1, P<0.001) and higher NRM (20% vs 13%, HR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3, P=0.007) in patients with HCT-CI ≥3. MMF did not have a significant impact on OS or NRM in patients with HCT-CI<3. The relapse rate did not differ in the MMF vs no MMF subsets (HR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.7-1.3, P=0.8) in multivariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GvHD was 8% (95% CI: 6-10) at 6-months post-HCT. The rate of grade III-IV acute GvHD did not differ by MMF (6-months incidence of 8% vs 7% in the MMF vs no MMF subsets, HR=1.1, 95% CI: 0.6-1.9, P=0.8) or by HCT-CI (6-months incidence of 8% vs 7% in HCT-CI ≥ vs <3, HR=1.1, 95% CI: 0.7-1.8, P=0.7). Multivariate analysis was not indicated for grade III-IV acute GvHD because no significant predictors were identified in univariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 17% (95% CI:15-20) at 2 years. The rate of chronic GvHD did not differ by MMF (2-years incidence of 18% vs 16% in the MMF vs no MMF subsets, HR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.7-1.5, P=0.8) or by HCT-CI (2-years incidence of 15% vs 20% in HCT-CI ≥ vs <3, HR=0.8, 95% CI: 0.5-1.1, P=0.1), in univariate analysis. There was also no significant (HR=1.3, 95% CI: 0.8-1.8, P=0.2) association between MMF and chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. Bacterial (14% vs 5%, p=0.3) and fungal (11% vs 0%, p=0.2) infections were more common causes of NRM in the MMF vs no MMF subsets in patients with HCT-CI ≥3. Acute GvHD accounted for 11% and 16% (p=0.4) of NRM in these groups, respectively. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing matched unrelated or related donor HCT, the addition of MMF prophylaxis was associated with significantly inferior OS and increased NRM, which was likely driven by infections, among patients with higher comorbidity burden. There was no discernable effect of MMF on severe acute or chronic GVHD.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5996-5996
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (25)

R

Rima M. Saliba

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

J

Jennifer Miatech

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

J

Jeremy Ramdial

3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

G

Gabriela Rondon

6The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

G

Gheath Alatrash

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

A

Amin Alousi

20MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

Q

Qaiser Bashir

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

G

George Chen

Department of Chemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

W

Warren Fingrut

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

C

Chitra Hosing

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

P

Partow Kebriaei

MD Anderson Cancer Center

I

Issa Khouri

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

D

David Marin

Y

Yago Nieto

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Hematopathology, Houston, United States

A

Amanda Olson

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

B

Betul Oran

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

U

Uday Popat

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

M

Muzaffar Qazilbash

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

P

Portia Smallbone

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

S

Samer Srour

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

M

Mark Tanner

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

K

Katayoun Rezvani

R

Richard Champlin

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States

E

Elizabeth Shpall

R

Rohtesh Mehta

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston, United States