Mismatching of unrelated donors beyond a single HLA-locus does not adversely impact outcomes at one year following transplantation: Results from the NMDP sponsored ACCESS study
Abstract
Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains inaccessible to many patients, particularly those of non-European ancestry, due to the limited availability of matched unrelated donors (URD). While single-HLA mismatched donors (7/8) often yield acceptable outcomes, URD HCT mismatched at ≥ 2 HLA alleles (<7/8) has historically been associated with poor survival and prohibitive toxicity. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has improved outcomes following mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT, potentially enabling less stringent donor matching. Whether the degree of donor-recipient HLA disparity remains prognostic after MMUD HCT when PTCy is used is unknown. The ACCESS trial (NCT04904588) was conducted by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Clinical Research Organization and prospectively evaluated PTCy-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in adult recipients of 4–7/8 (HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1) MMUD peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from donors age ≤35 years old following either myeloablative (MAC) or reduced intensity/non-myeloablative (RIC/NMA) conditioning. This analysis focused on all adult recipients of <7/8 grafts enrolled on the study across both conditioning strata, with descriptive comparison to patients who received 7/8 MMUD PBSC grafts. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included primary graft failure (PGF), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, acute and chronic GVHD, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). A total of 268 adults received MMUD PBSC grafts: 85 with <7/8 matches (MAC: n=23; RIC/NMA: n=62) and 183 with 7/8 matches (MAC: n=52; RIC/NMA: n=131). Among <7/8 recipients, median age was 57 years old (range, 24–78), 49% were male, with diagnoses of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (55%), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (15%), and lymphoma (14%). HLA mismatch distribution in the <7/8 group was 6/8 in 82%, 5/8 in 14%, and 4/8 in 4%. Most received fludarabine/melphalan (44%) or myeloablative busulfan/fludarabine (21%). Median CD34+ cell dose was 5.5 ×10^6/recipient kg (range: 3.2-8.0) and 75% of grafts were cryopreserved prior to infusion. Median donor age was 25.8 (range: 18.7-35.7) in the 7/8 group and 25.0 (range: 18.3-34.8) in the <7/8 group. The <7/8 cohort was racially and ethnically diverse, with 61% identifying as other than non-Hispanic white. The 7/8 cohort had a median age of 63 years old (range, 20–79), with 52% male. Disease distribution, conditioning intensity, and infused cell doses were similar to the <7/8 group. A smaller proportion of grafts were cryopreserved (61%), and 47% of patients identified as other than non-Hispanic White. One-year OS for <7/8 recipients was 86% (95% CI: 76–92%), compared to 79% (95% CI: 72–84%) in 7/8 recipients. One-year incidence of relapse was 23% (95% CI: 14–33%) in the <7/8 group and 17% (95% CI: 12–23%) in 7/8 recipients; NRM was 8% (95% CI: 4–16%) and 14% (95% CI: 9–19%), respectively. GRFS was 55% (95% CI: 43–65%) for <7/8 and 51% (95% CI: 44–58%) for 7/8 recipients. PGF occurred in 8% (95% CI: 3–18%) of <7/8 RIC recipients and 3% (95% CI: 1–8%) of 7/8 RIC recipients; no MAC recipients had PGF. At 6 months post-HCT, grade II–IV acute GVHD occurred in 34% (95% CI: 24–44%) of <7/8 patients and 39% (95% CI: 32–46%) of 7/8; grade III–IV acute GVHD was observed in 7% (95% CI: 3–14%) and 8% (95% CI: 5–13%), respectively. Moderate to severe chronic GVHD (NIH consensus criteria) at one year occurred in 8% (95% CI: 3–15%) of <7/8 recipients and 11% (95% CI: 7–16%) of 7/8 recipients. When grouped by conditioning intensity, 1-year outcomes within the <7/8 cohort were: OS 91% after MAC and 84% after RIC/NMA; relapse in 32% after MAC and 20% after RIC/NMA, respectively; GRFS was 53% for MAC and 55% for RIC/NMA; and NRM remained low at 9% after MAC and 8% after RIC/NMA. In this cohort of adult recipients of <7/8 MMUD PBSC grafts with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis enrolled on the ACCESS study, 1-year OS exceeded 80% and was comparable to 7/8 recipients. Relapse, NRM, and GVHD rates were similarly favorable and consistent with outcomes reported in 7/8 donor recipients. These findings support extending suitable MMUD match considerations to include 4-6/8 in the context of PTCy, potentially enabling near-universal donor access, while allowing for optimization of other non-HLA donor factors.
Article Details
Authors (39)
Monzr M. Al Malki
1City of Hope, Duarte, United States
Stephanie Bo-Subait
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Brent Logan
2CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Sarah Smith
Erin Leckrone
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Heather Stefanski
24CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Jeffery Auletta
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Stephen Spellman
10CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Craig Malmberg
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Medhat Askar
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Rachel Cusatis
1CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Brian Shaffer
2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Dipenkumar Modi
8Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Farhad Khimani
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
Mahasweta Gooptu
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Mehdi Hamadani
12Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Martin Maiers
Joseph Stanek
2CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, United States
Javier Meade
10Division of Hematologic Malignancies, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Boston, United States
Uttam Rao
5Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cell Therapy Network, Austin, United States
Jordan Milner
11Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida, UF Health Shands Children's Hospital, Gainesville, United States
Ramzi Abboud
4Washington University St Louis, St Louis, United States
Katarzyna Jamieson
14University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, United States
George Carrum
1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
Bhagirathbhai Dholaria
William Hogan
1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, United States
Ran Reshef
13Division of Hematology/Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
Satyajit Kosuri
11Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
Rachel Cook
1Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
Karen Ballen
1University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, United States
Alison Loren
24University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States
Karilyn Larkin
17Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, United States
Sally Arai
Muna Qayed
Sung Choi
7University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
Larisa Broglie
4CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Bronwen Shaw
1CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Steven Devine
24National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, United States
Antonio Jimenez Jimenez
28Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, United States