Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to stratify recurrence risk and adjuvant treatment benefit in a real-world colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort.
Abstract
3616 Background: ctDNA detection following curative surgery is known to predict recurrence in patients (pts) with stage II-III CRC. We investigate ctDNA dynamics in relation to clinical outcomes and their real-world impact on treatment decisions among pts with resected CRC. Methods: Based in a large community hospital system, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database inclusive of 407 pts with resected stage II-IV CRC. ctDNA was longitudinally quantified at MRD (2-12 weeks post-op) and surveillance timepoints (tp) using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex mPCR-NGS assay. Primary endpoint was the correlation between ctDNA status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objective was to evaluate its impact on treatment decisions. Survival distribution was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier Method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to adjust for clinicopathological covariates: age, gender, T, N, high risk features, obstruction, perforation, KRAS, BRAF, MMR. Results: Of 407 pts, 303 had complete evaluable data for analysis at cutoff 12/5/2025. After median follow-up of 29.6 months (mo), N=2342 ctDNA plasma levels were analyzed: 2 stage I, 119 stage II, 170 stage III, 12 stage IV. ctDNA at MRD tp was available for 259 pts (86%): 99 stage II, 144 stage III. ctDNA was negative at MRD tp in 211/259 (MRD-), positive in 48/259 (MRD+). Of 303 pts,180 (60%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT): 38 MRD+, 118 MRD-. 123 (40%) were observed: 9MRD+, 93 MRD-. MRD positivity was significantly associated with inferior DFS in all stages combined (HR = 13.4, 95% CI: 7.64–23.64, p<0.0001) and in all stage-stratified subgroups. Multivariate analysis confirmed ctDNA-positivity to be the most significant prognostic factor associated with DFS when compared with clinicopathologic factors. In MRD+ subgroup, pts with transient ctDNA clearance had significantly worse DFS than those with sustained clearance (HR = 5.27, 95% CI: 2.49–11.14, p<0.0001). Among MRD- pts, ACT conferred no significant DFS benefit vs observation (HR=1.52, p<0.05). Among MRD+ pts, ACT did not reach statistical significance. ctDNA positivity predicted recurrence with a lead time up to 23.9 mo (median 3.8 mo) before imaging, including in low ctDNA shedding sites. 7% had metastatic disease diagnosed earlier because of a positive test, prompting timely therapy. ctDNA testing was associated with higher than historical rates of oligometastasis-directed therapy (17%). Conclusions: Our results highlight the value of post-surgical ctDNA monitoring as a prognostic biomarker in CRC and its potential value for treatment decision making. Clinical utility of ctDNA-guided AC will further be established by ongoing trials (CIRCULATE-NA).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Mariem Galuia
AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
Joseph Gabriel Mchayleh
AdventHealth Research Institute, Orlando, FL
Lampros Karakozis
AdventHealth, Orlando, FL
Michael Abdelmasseh
George Nassif
AdventHealth, Orlando, FL
Mark Soliman
lakeland regional health medical, Lakeland, Florida, United States
Matthew Albert
AdventHealth, Orlando, FL
Justin Kelly
Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School
Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani
AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
Ahmed Zakari
AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL