Minimal Residual Disease–Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials
Abstract
PURPOSE Newly approved drugs and combinations treating multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in substantial improvements in patients' survival. To deliver rapid access to newer therapies, an earlier end point to expedite clinical trials is needed. Our objective was to evaluate the minimal residual disease–negative complete response (MRD-CR) as an intermediate end point for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed (ND) transplant-eligible (NDTE) patients, ND transplant-ineligible (NDTinE) patients, and patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data from 20 randomized multicenter trials were collected. Eleven studies (4,773 patients) with sufficient data were analyzed to evaluate whether 9- or 12-month MRD-CR classified at a 10 –5 threshold could be reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of new agents regarding PFS and OS. Global odds ratio (OR) was estimated using the bivariate Plackett Copula model. Supportive evaluation included correlations of the treatment effects on MRD-CR end points and PFS/OS, evaluated by both linear regression ( R 2 weighted least squared ) and Copula ( R 2 Copula ) models. RESULTS The analysis demonstrated that both 9- and 12-month MRD-CR strongly correlated with PFS at patient level in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM. Global ORs ranged from 3.06 to 16.24, all with 95% CIs excluding 1.0. Encouraging trial-level correlations ( R 2 , 0.61-0.70) were observed by pooling three populations and were stronger ( R 2 , 0.67-0.78) in the ND population. Similar results were observed for OS. CONCLUSION Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10 –5 threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (25)
Qian Shi
Bruno Paiva
Levi D. Pederson
1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Natalie Dimier
Roche Products Limited, St Albans, United Kingdom
Ela Talpes
Amgen Inc, San Francisco, CA
Thomas J. Prior
15Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Alberto Orfao
Philippe Moreau
Pieter Sonneveld
Shaji K. Kumar
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Jesse G. Dixon
Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Reshma Patel
Johnson & Johnson Inc, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
Blake J. Bartlett
Johnson & Johnson Inc, New Brunswick, NJ
Jordan Schecter
9Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, United States
Phillip McCarthy
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
Dirk Hose
Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
Anja Seckinger
Department of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels & Labor für Myelomforschung, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
D'Agostino Mattia
Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Hartmut Goldschmidt
Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
Stefania Oliva
10Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
Roger G. Owen
St James Institute, Leeds, United Kingdom
Kenneth C. Anderson
Jesus San-Miguel
Brian G.M. Durie
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Outpatient Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
Nikhil Munshi
3VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA