Microscale Tattooing of Hydrogels and Cells: Benzoxaborole‐Driven Microcontact Printing (µCP) on Glycosylated Surfaces

N Nazim Pallab (Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany) E Eric Sperlich (Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany) M Matthias Schenderlein (Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Polymer Research Geiselbergstr. 69 14476 Potsdam Germany) A Anne Krüger‐Genge (Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Polymer Research Geiselbergstr. 69 14476 Potsdam Germany) J Jinyuan Li (Center for Regenerative Nanomedicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Superior Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States) L Lukas Zeininger (Responsive Soft Materials and Interfaces Lab, Department of Colloid Chemistry Max‐Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Am Mühlenberg 1 17746 Potsdam Germany) Z Zdeněk Tošner (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University 2 , Hlavova 8, Prague CZ-128 43,) M Mariusz Uchman (Faculty of Science, Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry Charles University Hlavova 8 128 43 Prague 2 Czech Republic) M Martin Reifarth (Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany)

Abstract

Abstract Microcontact printing (µCP) is a widely used technique for microscale surface patterning. In this study, we present a polymer‐supported µCP method for the patterning of (bioactive) glycosylated surfaces under hydrated conditions. Patterning is achieved by direct contact with a grooved polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp, whose surface was grafted with a dopamine‐containing polymer. The polymer brushes offer an anchor for the boronic acid derivative 6‐aminobenzo[c][1,2]oxaborol‐1(3H)‐ol (ABOB), used as an ink for surface functionalization, to introduce patterns to three different surfaces as substrates: (1) monosaccharide‐modified hydrogel surfaces possessing aldose (glucose, fucose, galactose) or ketose (fructose, sorbose) functions; (2) glycosylated surfaces of polymeric microspheres; and (3) the membranes of mammalian cells, such as human primary gastric cells and others. During µCP, ABOB patterns transferred to the target surface through the formation of carbohydrate‐ABOB complexes at fully hydrated, neutral pH conditions. Fluorescence microscopy confirmed the successful transfer of ABOB patterns to glycosylated surfaces, with clear “tattoo‐like” signatures observed on hydrogels, glycosylated particle surfaces and cellular interfaces.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 35
Published August 25, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (9)

N

Nazim Pallab

Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany

E

Eric Sperlich

Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany

M

Matthias Schenderlein

Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Polymer Research Geiselbergstr. 69 14476 Potsdam Germany

A

Anne Krüger‐Genge

Fraunhofer Institute of Applied Polymer Research Geiselbergstr. 69 14476 Potsdam Germany

J

Jinyuan Li

Center for Regenerative Nanomedicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Superior Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States

L

Lukas Zeininger

Responsive Soft Materials and Interfaces Lab, Department of Colloid Chemistry Max‐Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Am Mühlenberg 1 17746 Potsdam Germany

Z

Zdeněk Tošner

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University 2 , Hlavova 8, Prague CZ-128 43,

M

Mariusz Uchman

Faculty of Science, Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry Charles University Hlavova 8 128 43 Prague 2 Czech Republic

M

Martin Reifarth

Institute of Chemistry University of Potsdam Karl‐Liebknecht‐Str. 24–25 14476 Potsdam Germany