Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH <sub>4</sub> growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH <sub>4</sub> and δ <sup>13</sup> C–CH <sub>4</sub>

B Ben Riddell-Young S Sylvia Englund Michel (Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado) X Xin Lan P Pieter Tans (Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado) T Thomas Röckmann (Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University) B Bibhasvata Dasgupta (Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University) Y Youmi Oh (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado) L Lori M. P. Bruhwiler (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado) R Ryo Fujita (Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency) T Taku Umezawa (Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University) S Shinji Morimoto (Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University) J John B. Miller (Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Abstract

Methane (CH 4 ) is the second most important greenhouse gas and has been rising following a brief period of stabilization from 1999 to 2006. Determining the cause of this rise is critical for reducing emissions and predicting future climate sensitivity. The carbon and hydrogen stable isotopic composition of atmospheric CH 4 is controlled by variability in isotopically distinguishable emission categories and fractionating sink processes. While most studies using atmospheric δ 13 C–CH 4 data suggest a dominantly microbial source for recent CH 4 growth, this understanding is not uniform, and uncertainties remain [S. Schwietzke et al. , Nature 538 , 88–91 (2016), S. Basu et al. , Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22 , 15351–15377 (2022), J. Thanwerdas, M. Saunois, A. Berchet, I. Pison, P. Bousquet, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24 , 2129–2167 (2024)]. Here, we present a harmonized global measurement record of atmospheric δD–CH 4 and estimate emissions from 1999 to 2022 with global isotope mass balance calculations using both carbon and hydrogen isotopic ratios. We conduct thorough uncertainty analyses to separate absolute magnitude and emission trend uncertainties and find with high confidence that trends in δ 13 C–CH 4 and δD–CH 4 observations are both consistent with an entirely microbial emission driver of the post-2006 CH 4 rise, while fossil fuel emissions have remained relatively stable.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 50
Published December 16, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (12)

B

Ben Riddell-Young

S

Sylvia Englund Michel

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado

X

Xin Lan

P

Pieter Tans

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado

T

Thomas Röckmann

Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University

B

Bibhasvata Dasgupta

Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University

Y

Youmi Oh

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado

L

Lori M. P. Bruhwiler

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado

R

Ryo Fujita

Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency

T

Taku Umezawa

Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University

S

Shinji Morimoto

Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University

J

John B. Miller

Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration