Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH <sub>4</sub> growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH <sub>4</sub> and δ <sup>13</sup> C–CH <sub>4</sub>
Abstract
Methane (CH 4 ) is the second most important greenhouse gas and has been rising following a brief period of stabilization from 1999 to 2006. Determining the cause of this rise is critical for reducing emissions and predicting future climate sensitivity. The carbon and hydrogen stable isotopic composition of atmospheric CH 4 is controlled by variability in isotopically distinguishable emission categories and fractionating sink processes. While most studies using atmospheric δ 13 C–CH 4 data suggest a dominantly microbial source for recent CH 4 growth, this understanding is not uniform, and uncertainties remain [S. Schwietzke et al. , Nature 538 , 88–91 (2016), S. Basu et al. , Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22 , 15351–15377 (2022), J. Thanwerdas, M. Saunois, A. Berchet, I. Pison, P. Bousquet, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24 , 2129–2167 (2024)]. Here, we present a harmonized global measurement record of atmospheric δD–CH 4 and estimate emissions from 1999 to 2022 with global isotope mass balance calculations using both carbon and hydrogen isotopic ratios. We conduct thorough uncertainty analyses to separate absolute magnitude and emission trend uncertainties and find with high confidence that trends in δ 13 C–CH 4 and δD–CH 4 observations are both consistent with an entirely microbial emission driver of the post-2006 CH 4 rise, while fossil fuel emissions have remained relatively stable.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (12)
Ben Riddell-Young
Sylvia Englund Michel
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado
Xin Lan
Pieter Tans
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado
Thomas Röckmann
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University
Bibhasvata Dasgupta
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University
Youmi Oh
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado
Lori M. P. Bruhwiler
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado
Ryo Fujita
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency
Taku Umezawa
Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University
Shinji Morimoto
Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Tohoku University
John B. Miller
Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration