Mevrometostat (PF-06821497) in combination with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with abiraterone acetate: The phase 3, randomized MEVPRO-1 study.
Abstract
TPS288 Background: Resistance to androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (ARPI; e.g., abiraterone, enzalutamide) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) may be driven by preservation of AR signaling through various mechanisms. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and ARPI resistance. Combining ARPI with therapies that modulate alternative signaling pathways, including epigenetic modifiers such as EZH2, could be a promising treatment approach to overcome resistance. Mevrometostat (PF-06821497) is a potent and selective small molecule EZH2 inhibitor. Results from the dose-escalation period of a phase 1 study (NCT03460977) showed promising activity for mevrometostat combined with enzalutamide, with a manageable adverse-event profile in abiraterone-exposed patients with mCRPC (Schweizer MT, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2024;42(16_suppl):5061). The current trial aims to evaluate radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of mevrometostat plus enzalutamide compared with standard of care in patients with mCRPC previously treated with abiraterone. Methods: MEVPRO-1 (NCT06551324) is a global, open-label, phase 3 trial in patients with mCRPC aged ≥18 years with progression on/after ≥12 weeks abiraterone, castration testosterone levels ≤50 ng/dL, ECOG performance status 0–2, and life expectancy ≥6 months. Approximately 600 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive mevrometostat (875mg BD with food) with enzalutamide (160mg QD), or physician’s choice of enzalutamide (160mg QD) or docetaxel (75mg/m 2 intravenously every 21d). Randomization will be stratified by previous docetaxel in metastatic castration-sensitive setting, physician’s choice of comparator (enzalutamide/docetaxel), and presence of hepatic metastases. The primary endpoint is BICR-assessed rPFS per RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) and PCWG3 (bone) assessed by blinded central radiology review. Key secondary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include anti-tumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics, ctDNA, and patient-reported outcomes. Stratified log-rank P -values, HRs, and 95% CIs will be estimated using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, and Kaplan–Meier analysis will summarize time-to-event endpoints. Clinical trial information: NCT06551324 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Neeraj Agarwal
Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
Michael Thomas Schweizer
University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
Elena Castro
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Arun Azad
Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
Daniel J. George
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Jayeta Chakrabarti
Pfizer Inc., New York, NY
Sujata Narayanan
Oncology, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY
Yiyun Tang
Oncology Division, Pfizer, South San Francisco, CA
Karim Fizazi
Centre Oscar Lambret, University of Paris-Saclay, Lille, France