Methodologic Standards for Follow-Up Extension in Cardiovascular Trials: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

M Mario Gaudino S Sigrid Sandner E Emilia Bagiella J Joshua A. Beckman E Emilie P. Belley-Cote M Marcus Flather A Alexander C. Gregg I Irbaz Hameed S Stuart Pocock (Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid) B Bjorn Redfors (Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York) F Frank Rockhold

Abstract

Extension follow-up trials are essential for understanding the long-term safety and efficacy of cardiovascular interventions. Whereas primary randomized trials primarily capture short-term outcomes, extended observation may reveal delayed benefits or harms that are highly relevant to clinical decision-making. However, methodologic standards for extension trials remain poorly defined, leading to inconsistent design, analysis, and reporting. This scientific statement outlines best practices for cardiovascular trial extensions, addressing outcome selection, duration and completeness of follow-up, and analytic strategies suited to evolving treatment effects. Practical considerations, including strategies for participant retention, reconsent, data continuity, and resource allocation, are also discussed.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published August 03, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Mario Gaudino

S

Sigrid Sandner

E

Emilia Bagiella

J

Joshua A. Beckman

E

Emilie P. Belley-Cote

M

Marcus Flather

A

Alexander C. Gregg

I

Irbaz Hameed

S

Stuart Pocock

Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid

B

Bjorn Redfors

Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York

F

Frank Rockhold