Mechanism of action and translation to the clinic of detalimogene voraplasmid (EG-70): A novel, investigational, non-viral immunotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

V Vikram M. Narayan (Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA) Y Yair Lotan (Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) M Marie-Line Goulet (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) S Shauna Dauphinee (enGene, Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) D Daniel Veilleux (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) K Kristine S Louis (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) D David Lazure (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) S Sarah Stevenson (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) D Darius Bilimoria (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) F Fazmina Zamzameer (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) X Ximin Chen (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) S Sébastien Sublemontier (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) S Sahar Amirkhani (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) C Carlos Fleet (EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada) R Raj Pruthi (enGene Inc., Waltham, MA) A Anthony Cheung (enGene, Inc., Waltham, MA) J James C. Sullivan (EnGene Inc., Waltham, MA) V Vignesh T. Packiam (Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ) A Ashish M. Kamat

Abstract

826 Background: Detalimogene voraplasmid (EG-70) is a novel, investigational, non-integrating, non-viral gene therapy designed to elicit local stimulation of anti-tumor immune response in the bladder while mitigating the risk of systemic toxicities from immune stimulation. It is administered by intravesical instillation (IVI) to eligible patients with NMIBC to drive bladder-localized expression of innate (RIG-I agonists) and adaptive (IL-12) immune regulators and remodel the tumor microenvironment. LEGEND is an ongoing Phase 1/2 study (NCT04752722) investigating the safety and efficacy of detalimogene voraplasmid in bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive NMIBC. We present preclinical data supporting the mechanism of action of detalimogene voraplasmid, which involves immune cell recruitment, tumor microenvironment remodeling and immune training on neoantigens and tumor clearance. Methods: Preclinical evaluation of detalimogene voraplasmid was conducted in vitro in relevant cell lines and in vivo in an orthotopic syngeneic model of bladder cancer in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. Luciferase-expressing MB49 cells were instilled in the bladder on Day 1; following confirmation of tumor engraftment by in vivo bioluminescence imaging on Day 9, mice received two weekly IVIs of mEG-70 (a murine surrogate of EG-70) on Days 10&17. Efficacy of mEG-70 was assessed post-dosing by flow cytometry, MSD immunoassays, immunohistochemistry, bioluminescence in vivo imaging, and overall survival. Animal experimentation was approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee (IACC) and conducted in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) guidelines. The Phase 1 component of the LEGEND study evaluated detalimogene voraplasmid in patients with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with carcinoma in situ (CIS). Results: Immune profiling revealed remodeling of the tumor microenvironment from an immunosuppressive phenotype to a pro-inflammatory milieu supportive of tumor clearance. Accordingly, administration of mEG-70 was associated with marked reduction in tumor burden and improvement in survival in mice. As demonstrated by either bladder or flank tumor cell rechallenge, the anti-tumor immune response in surviving tumor-free mice resulted in durable protection against subsequent tumor re-challenge, and systemic immune memory. In the Phase 1 part of the LEGEND study, detalimogene voraplasmid was generally well tolerated, with an overall complete response rate of 73% in patients with NMIBC with CIS. Conclusions: These preclinical findings demonstrate that detalimogene voraplasmid delivers genetically encoded immunostimulatory payloads locally to the bladder. The mechanism of action described preclinically has been translated into the clinic in the Phase 1 part of the LEGEND study.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 826-826
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

V

Vikram M. Narayan

Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Y

Yair Lotan

Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

M

Marie-Line Goulet

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

S

Shauna Dauphinee

enGene, Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

D

Daniel Veilleux

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

K

Kristine S Louis

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

D

David Lazure

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

S

Sarah Stevenson

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

D

Darius Bilimoria

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

F

Fazmina Zamzameer

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

X

Ximin Chen

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

S

Sébastien Sublemontier

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

S

Sahar Amirkhani

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

C

Carlos Fleet

EnGene Inc., St-Laurent, QC, Canada

R

Raj Pruthi

enGene Inc., Waltham, MA

A

Anthony Cheung

enGene, Inc., Waltham, MA

J

James C. Sullivan

EnGene Inc., Waltham, MA

V

Vignesh T. Packiam

Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ

A

Ashish M. Kamat