Management of relapsed stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor with retroperitoneal or pelvic only relapse.
Abstract
630 Background: For patients (pts) with stage 1 seminomatous germ cell tumor (SGCT) on active surveillance (AS), front-line therapy depends on the location and extent of relapse. We describe the characteristics and management of pts on AS with stage I SGCT with relapse in the retroperitoneum (RP) or pelvis only. Methods: The prospectively maintained Indiana University testicular cancer database was queried for pts with stage 1 SGCT on AS w/ RP or pelvic only relapse between 1990-2024. Pts were categorized into a chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation (XRT) group based on treatment at relapse. Comparisons between groups were done using Chi-square tests for categorical variables or Kuskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log rank test to compare groups. Results: We identified 71 pts with stage 1 SGCT on AS w/ relapse in the RP or pelvis only. The median age at diagnosis was 37.2 yrs (range, 19.5-74.5). IGCCCG risk was good in all pts. At time of relapse, 37 pts (52.1%) were treated with chemo, 20 with surgery (28.2%), and 14 (19.7%) with XRT. The median time to relapse on stage I AS for pts treated with chemo was 9.5 months (0.84-91.7) compared to 19.9 months (1.6-60.2) with surgery and 13.1 months (4.6-48.8) with XRT (p=0.13). Chemo regimens used were BEP X 3 (62.2%), EP X 4 (21.6%), BEP X 4 (2.7%) and other (13.5%). 68 pts (95.8%) relapsed in the RP; 3 (4.2%) relapsed in the pelvis only. All 9 pts with lymph node (LN) size >5 cm were treated with chemo. In the 32 pts with LN size <3 cm, 12 (37.5%) were treated with surgery, 12 (37.5%) with chemo, and 8 (25%) with XRT. 11 total pts (15.5%) relapsed after front-line therapy and thus required multimodality treatment. This included 8 (21.6%) in the chemo group who relapsed; 2 out of 8 required RPLND while 6 were treated with salvage or high dose chemotherapy. 1 patient (5%) in the surgery group relapsed and required chemotherapy. In the XRT group, 2 pts (14.3%) relapsed; 1 was treated with salvage chemo and 1 with surgery. With a median follow-up time of 3.03 yrs (0-14.8), the 2-yr PFS for pts treated with chemo was 73.8%, surgery was 95%, and XRT was 92.3% (p=0.14). 2-yr OS was 100% for all treatment groups (p=0.58). Conclusions: In pts on AS with stage I SGCT w/ RP or pelvic only relapse, there was no difference in survival outcomes based on front-line therapy received. In this cohort of pts carefully selected for RPLND, the majority were cured with single-modality therapy; most of these pts had RP lymph nodes <3cm with a longer median time to relapse while on AS.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Ahmed Bilal Khalid
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
Sandra K. Althouse
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Rebecca Hassoun
The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
Tareq Salous
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Clint Cary
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Timothy A. Masterson
Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Lawrence H. Einhorn
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Nabil Adra
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Jennifer King
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN