Management of relapsed primary retroperitoneal (RP) germ-cell tumor (GCT) after front-line chemotherapy.

K Kirsten Lewis (Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN) R Rebecca Hassoun (The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH) S Sandra K. Althouse (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) T Tareq Salous (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) N Nasser H. Hanna (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) L Lawrence H. Einhorn (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) N Nabil Adra (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) J Jennifer King (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN)

Abstract

637 Background: Primary RP GCT represents a rare subset of extragonadal GCTs. While front-line therapy remains similar to gonadal GCT, there is limited data on management of relapsed disease for these patients (pts). Here, we describe management and outcomes of pts with relapsed primary RP GCT. Methods: The prospectively maintained Indiana University testicular cancer database was queried for patients with primary RP GCT who relapsed after first-line therapy between 1990-2024. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival outcomes based on type of second-line chemotherapy was compared using the log rank test. Results: 53 pts were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 33.7yrs (17.4-67.9). Primary tumor pathology was non-seminoma in 75.5% and seminoma in 24.5%. Predominant histology was seminoma (30.2%), mixed (26.4%), choriocarcinoma (17.0%), yolk sac tumor (13.2%), embryonal (9.4%), teratoma (3.8%). Other metastasis sites included pulmonary (56.6%), liver (35.9%), posterior mediastinum (15.1%), pelvic lymph nodes (13.2%), brain (13.2%), bone (9.4%). IGCCCG risk was good in 30.2%, intermediate in 15.1%, and poor in 54.7%. First-line chemo was BEPx4 (54.6%), VIPx4 (11.3%), BEP x3 (7.5%), EPx4 (7.6%), BEPx2 + HDCTx2 (2.0%), and other (17.0%). All 53 pts had progression of disease after first-line chemo. 44 received salvage chemotherapy, 5 received RPLND, 2 other salvage surgery, 1 radiation, and 2 received no salvage therapy. Salvage chemo was HDCT for 69.8% vs. standard salvage chemo for 30.2%. For pts treated with HDCT, 83% completed 2 cycles. 46.7% of those treated with HDCT progressed afterward. Of pts who had salvage RPLND, 3 were found to have teratoma and 2 had active GCT. 2 pts had other salvage surgery; 1 had thoracotomy with GCT and 1 had craniotomy with GCT. At time of last follow-up, 28.3% of all pts were alive with NED, 11.3% were alive with disease, 13.2% were lost to follow-up, and 47.2% had died of disease. The table lists PFS and OS by salvage chemo type. Conclusions: Patients with relapsed primary RP GCT seem to have worse outcomes compared with historical results from relapsed gonadal GCT. A subset of patients with relapsed primary RP GCT are curable with salvage therapy. Survival outcomes by salvage chemotherapy received. HDCT N=30 Standard dose chemo N= 14 p-value 2-yr PFS 47.7% (95% 28.7-64.5) 31.8% (95% 7.7-59.9) p=0.18 2yr OS 53.8% (95% 34.0-70.0) 68.6 (95% 30.5-88.7) p=0.84

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 637-637
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

K

Kirsten Lewis

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

R

Rebecca Hassoun

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH

S

Sandra K. Althouse

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

T

Tareq Salous

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

N

Nasser H. Hanna

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

L

Lawrence H. Einhorn

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

N

Nabil Adra

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

J

Jennifer King

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN