Male-derived PBP4 is essential for sperm competition by mediating sperm motility in moths
Abstract
Male moths rely on antennal olfactory sensilla to detect female-emitted sex pheromones during mate localization, a process critically mediated by pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs) that facilitate ligand transport to dendritic membrane-bound pheromone receptors. Intriguingly, a divergent PBP paralog (PBP4) in noctuid moths has been identified exhibiting predominant expression in the male reproductive system, though its functional significance remained elusive. In this study with Spodoptera exigua , we demonstrated that PBP4 is specifically expressed in male accessory glands (MAGs) and transferred to females during copulation. CRISPR-mediated PBP4 knockout (PBP4 −/− ) significantly reduced male reproductive success via impaired sperm competition, evidenced by diminished offspring sired. Transcriptomic and qPCR analyses revealed expressional correlation between PBP4 and the odorant receptor coreceptor (Orco), and similar sperm competition deficits were observed in Orco −/− males. Furthermore, both mutants exhibited compromised sperm motility and reduced sperm transfer from spermatophores to spermathecae. In vitro sperm motility assays showed that a specific agonist of Orco, VUAA1, robustly enhanced sperm motility in an Orco-dependent manner. Analyses of four additional moth species, including noctuids and non-noctuids, revealed a similar specific expression in the male reproductive tracts in all of them. Our findings unveil a noncanonical role for PBP4 in reproductive fitness and evolutionary conservation of the PBP-OR signaling pathway.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (11)
Yu He
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Med-X Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China.
Qi Yan
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University
Jing-Hao Hou
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University
Ying Li
Zhi-Qiang Wei
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University
Jin-Meng Guo
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University
Nai-Yong Liu
Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, Southwest Forestry University
Markus Knaden
Bill S. Hansson
Shuang-Lin Dong
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University
Jin Zhang