Major adverse cardiovascular events after teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: A multicenter study from the u.s. multiple myeloma immunotherapy consortium.
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Teclistamab is the first FDA approved BCMA-directed bispecific antibody for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). With BCMA-targeting CAR-T therapies, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a risk factor for cardiotoxicity. Teclistamab was associated with fatal cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in a recent US pharmacovigilance database analysis, but this analysis was limited by reporting bias. Therefore, the aim of our study is to conduct a multicenter study to define the real-world incidence of CVAEs in RRMM patients treated with teclistamab. Method We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study of patients receiving teclistamab at 5 medical centers. Baseline oncologic and cardiovascular characteristics (including vital sign and echocardiographic data) were collected. Baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as presence of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, severe or symptomatic valvular heart disease, or stroke at baseline. CVAE was collected and categorized based on CTCAE v5.0 by each institution. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was a composite outcome with any of the following: congestive heart failure, asymptomatic cardiomyopathy (interval LVEF drop >10% to resultant LVEF less than 50%), coronary artery disease requiring intervention, stroke or cardiovascular death. Arrhythmia was a composite outcome with any of the following: atrial tachyarrhythmia, ventricular tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia. Median follow-up was calculated through reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to define the relation between MACE and survival. Cause of death was categorized as myeloma-related death or non-myeloma-related deaths (i.e. CRS, infection or cardiovascular death). Cause-specific Cox regression was performed to define relationship between MACE and cause of death. Results In a cohort of 219 patients treated with teclistamab with median follow-up of 20.1 months, 7.3% (N=16) developed MACE, 7.3% (N=16) developed arrhythmia and 12.8% (N=28) developing any MACE or arrhythmia. MACE occurred at a median of 4.5 days (IQR 2.25-15.75 days) after teclistamab step-up. The incidence of MACE was 16.4% in patients with baseline CVD versus 2.7% in those without baseline CVD (p<0.001). Patients who developed MACE had inferior ECOG performance status (PS) (PS >=2: 62.5% vs. 27.7%; p=0.008). Additionally, baseline hemoglobin level (9 vs 10g/dL; p=0.072) was numerically lower in MACE, compared to no MACE. There was no difference in age, sex, bone marrow (BM) plasma cell burden, ferritin, C-reactive protein or LDH levels between MACE vs. no MACE group. Patients who developed MACE had lower baseline diastolic blood pressure (67.7 vs 73.8mmHg; p=0.041) and numerically lower LVEF (51.4 vs 59.3%; p=0.059; baseline echocardiogram performed in 86% of all cohort). Patients who developed MACE had similar incidences of CRS (Grade >=2: 25.0 vs 16.7%; p=0.620) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) grade 2 or higher (12.5 vs 7.5%; p=0.812). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, MACE was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.41-5.25; p=0.003), after adjusting for baseline CVD, age, high BM burden, extramedullary disease, and plasma cell leukemia. In cause-specific multivariable Cox regression analysis, MACE was independently associated with non-myeloma-related death (HR: 10.77 95% CI 4.39- 26.41; p<0.001) but not with myeloma-related death (1.54; 95% CI 0.64- 3.70; p=0.336). Conclusion In conclusion, in this large, real-world multicenter study, we observed that MACE occurred in over 7% of patients following teclistamab for RRMM, typically within 2 weeks of initiation. MACE was significantly associated with increased non-myeloma-related mortality. In contrast to CAR-T therapy, CRS or ICANS were not associated with MACE, whereas majority of patients who developed MACE had ECOG PS >=2 or baseline cardiovascular disease. More studies are necessary to define mechanisms and strategies to reduce these MACE and improve survival. Patients with baseline cardiovascular disease or poor performance status may benefit from cardiovascular optimization before and during teclistamab therapy.
Article Details
Authors (36)
Dae Hyun Lee
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Saurabh Zanwar
Danai Dima
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Utkarsh Goel
6Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, United States
Austin Chao
3University of South Florida, Tampa, United States
Kyle Lien
3University of South Florida, Tampa, United States
Rahul Banerjee
Sandra Mazzoni
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Jack Khouri
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Louis Williams
Faiz Anwer
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Yi Lin
Raffaella Cassano
6Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Daniel Addison
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
Richard Cheng
James Davis
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Anthony Dominick
7Hollings Cancer Center, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States
Kimberly Green
14Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States
Kelley Julian
6The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States
Douglas Sborov
9University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt lake City, United States
Sanath Shetty
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Mariola Vazquez-Martinez
2Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Gabriel De Avila
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
Ariel Dixon
2Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Brandon Blue
Naval Research Enterprise Internship Program Student Residing in the Electronics Sciences and Technology Division, United States Naval Research Laboratory
Ciara Louise Freeman
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Hossam M. Ali
10Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, United States
Frederick Locke
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
Mohammed Alomar
Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Melissa Alsina
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States
Rachid Baz
1Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
Kenneth Shain
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Doris Hansen
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Ariel Grajales-Cruz
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Shahzad Raza
Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland