Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic factor in pT2 urothelial carcinoma.

I Iván Macharashvili (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) I Ivan Adolfo Schwartz (Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina) P Patricia Rioja (Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru) F Felipe Jové (Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina) A Ana Salomón (Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas Alfredo Lanari, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina) S Silvia P. Neciosup (Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru) M Mariano Daniel Aymar (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina) M Mario Hernandez (Urology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain) M Maria Natalia Gandur-Quiroga (Department of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumors, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina) M Matias Gonzalez (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina) D Daniel Castellano (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid) T Timothy D. Gilligan (Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH) F Federico Cayol (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Abstract

e16582 Background: Although neoadjuvant therapy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, up to 40% of patients still undergo cystectomy without prior treatment. Adjuvant therapy remains non-standardized, particularly for pT2 patients, and we lack widely accepted criteria for selecting pT2 patients for adjuvant therapy. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-established prognostic factor, especially for pT3 or higher tumors. Our study aims to explore LVI as a potential negative prognostic factor in pT2 tumors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional analysis of patients from 2006 to 2023 who underwent upfront radical cystectomy and were staged with pT2N0 urothelial carcinoma. Event-free and overall survival were compared in patients with and without LVI. To evaluate event-free survival and overall survival, we used a time-to-event analysis, adjusting for potential confounders using Cox regression. Results: We present an interim analysis involving 105 patients. The prevalence of LVI positive patients was 21.9% (n=23). The median follow up was 61 months. LVI positivity was associated with shorter event-free survival (41 months vs. not reached, HR: 3.73 CI 95% 1.55-8.9. p=0.004) and overall survival (NR vs. NR, HR 2.39 CI 95% 1.06-5.4 p=0.03). At 5 years, 65% of LVI-positive patients remained free of recurrence and alive, compared to 82.9% and 89% for LVI-negative patients, respectively. Conclusions: LVI is a strong adverse prognostic factor in pT2pN0 urothelial carcinoma treated with upfront cystectomy. Event free survival and overall survival were significantly worse in the LVI positive group. Therefore, this population of patients has a greater need for effective adjuvant therapy. Results. LVI positive (n=23) LVI negative (n=82) Age (mean) 64,5 y 66,6 y Gender Male 23 (100%) 63 (76,8%) Histology Urotelial 17 (73,9%) 65 (79,3%) Mixed variants 6 (26,1%) 17 (20,7%) Lymph nodes resected (mean) 10 10 Relapse 8 (34,8%) 17 (20%) EFS (months) 23,2 63,2 OS (months) 29 70

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

I

Iván Macharashvili

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

I

Ivan Adolfo Schwartz

Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

P

Patricia Rioja

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru

F

Felipe Jové

Instituto de Oncologia Angel H Roffo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

A

Ana Salomón

Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas Alfredo Lanari, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

S

Silvia P. Neciosup

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru

M

Mariano Daniel Aymar

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

M

Mario Hernandez

Urology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

M

Maria Natalia Gandur-Quiroga

Department of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Tumors, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

M

Matias Gonzalez

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

D

Daniel Castellano

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid

T

Timothy D. Gilligan

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

F

Federico Cayol

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina