LUMINOSITY, a phase 2 study of telisotuzumab vedotin in patients with c-Met protein–overexpressing non-squamous <i>EGFR</i> -wildtype advanced NSCLC: Efficacy outcomes by prior therapy.

J Jonathan W. Goldman S Shun Lu J Jair Bar (Institute of Oncology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Ramat Gan Israel) H Hidehito Horinouchi (National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan) A Aaron Scott Mansfield (Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Christina S. Baik (Thoracic, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle) J John Stewart Hrom (Forrest General Hospital and Hattiesburg Clinic of Hematology and Oncology, Hattiesburg, MS) R Rebecca Heist (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) C Christine Ratajczak (AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) S Shilpen Patel D Deise Uema (AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) S Summer Xia (AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) P Pallavi Mhaske (AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) M Mukesh Verma (AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) D David Ross Camidge (University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO)

Abstract

8618 Background: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate comprising the mAb telisotuzumab and the microtubule polymerization inhibitor monomethyl auristatin E. In the phase 2 LUMINOSITY trial (NCT03539536), Teliso-V monotherapy 1.9 mg/kg showed durable responses and a generally manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with c-Met protein–overexpressing (OE) non-squamous (NSQ) EGFR -wildtype (WT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein we present an analysis of efficacy outcomes according to prior platinum or prior platinum and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with locally advanced/metastatic c-Met protein–OE NSQ EGFR -WT NSCLC who had ≤2 prior lines of therapy, including ≤1 line of chemotherapy, were treated with 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V Q2W. c-Met protein overexpression (by immunohistochemistry clinical trial assay for MET [SP44] [Roche]) was defined as ≥25% tumor cells with 3+ staining intensity (high: ≥50% 3+; intermediate [int]: 25 to &lt;50% 3+). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 21 Feb 2024, 172 pts received ≥1 dose of Teliso-V and 168 pts were included in efficacy analyses (c-Met high, n=84; c-Met int, n=84). In the c-Met OE total population, 97.6% of pts received prior platinum and 78.6% received prior platinum + ICI. Efficacy data for pts with prior platinum and platinum + ICI therapies are shown in the Table. Among the 172 dosed pts, the most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (31%), peripheral edema (16%), and fatigue (14%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (7%). Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that Teliso-V elicited durable responses in pts with c-Met protein–OE NSQ EGFR -WT NSCLC regardless of whether they had received prior platinum or platinum + ICI therapies; the efficacy outcomes in these subgroups were consistent with those in the overall pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT03539536 . Platinum Platinum + ICI Overall ORR, a n/N (%) [95% CI] c-Met OE total c-Met high c-Met int 48/164 (29.3) [22.4, 36.9]28/81 (34.6) [24.3, 46.0]20/83 (24.1) [15.4, 34.7] 38/132 (28.8) [21.2, 37.3]22/67 (32.8) [21.8, 45.4]16/65 (24.6) [14.8, 36.9] 49/168 (29.2) [22.4, 36.7]29/84 (34.5) [24.5, 45.7]20/84 (23.8) [15.2, 34.3] Median DOR, a mo [95% CI] c-Met OE total c-Met high c-Met int 7.2 [5.5, 11.3]9.0 [3.8, 12.0]7.2 [4.7, 11.5] 7.2 [5.5, 11.0]9.0 [3.8, 11.3]7.2 [5.3, 11.5] 7.2 [5.5, 11.0]7.2 [4.2, 12.0]7.2 [4.7, 11.5] a Per independent central review. DOR, duration of response.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 8618-8618
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

J

Jonathan W. Goldman

S

Shun Lu

J

Jair Bar

Institute of Oncology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Ramat Gan Israel

H

Hidehito Horinouchi

National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

A

Aaron Scott Mansfield

Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Christina S. Baik

Thoracic, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle

J

John Stewart Hrom

Forrest General Hospital and Hattiesburg Clinic of Hematology and Oncology, Hattiesburg, MS

R

Rebecca Heist

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

C

Christine Ratajczak

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL

S

Shilpen Patel

D

Deise Uema

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL

S

Summer Xia

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL

P

Pallavi Mhaske

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL

M

Mukesh Verma

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL

D

David Ross Camidge

University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO